125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38376303)
21. Validity of different cytological grading systems of breast carcinoma--a hospital-based study in South India.
Rekha TS; Nandini NM; Dhar M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3013-6. PubMed ID: 22393982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. FNAC of Breast Lesions with Special Reference to IAC Standardized Reporting and Comparative Study of Cytohistological Grading of Breast Carcinoma.
Panwar H; Ingle P; Santosh T; Singh V; Bugalia A; Hussain N
J Cytol; 2020; 37(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 31942096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.
Robinson IA; McKee G; Nicholson A; D'Arcy J; Jackson PA; Cook MG; Kissin MW
Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8903):947-9. PubMed ID: 7909010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cytohistomorphological grading of breast carcinoma with special reference to apoptotic rates and lymph node metastasis.
Khan N; Rana F; Afroz N; Khan MA
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):613-8. PubMed ID: 17883162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspirates and its relation with histological grading.
Phukan JP; Sinha A; Deka JP
South Asian J Cancer; 2015; 4(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 25839018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems.
Wani FA; Bhardwaj S; Kumar D; Katoch P
J Cytol; 2010 Apr; 27(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 21157550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma--a feasible proposition?
Hunt CM; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Locker A; Pearson D; Blamey RW
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(5):287-95. PubMed ID: 2101675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correlation of proliferative index with various clinicopathologic prognostic parameters in primary breast carcinoma: A study from North India.
Marwah N; Batra A; Marwah S; Gupta V; Shakya S; Sen R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(3):537-542. PubMed ID: 29893312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of six parametric Robinson and three parametric Howell's modification of Scarf-BloomRichardson grading method on breast aspirates with histopathology: A prospective study.
Walke VA; Gunjkar G
Cytojournal; 2017; 14():31. PubMed ID: 29333191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative Study of Cytomorphological Robinson's Grading for Breast Carcinoma with Modified Bloom-Richardson Histopathological Grading.
Sood N; Nigam JS; Yadav P; Rewri S; Sharma A; Omhare A; Malhotra J
Patholog Res Int; 2013; 2013():146542. PubMed ID: 24187646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Novel Role of Cytomorphology from Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Evaluating the Status of Prognostic Factors including Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and HER2 in Breast Cancer.
Li Y; Jia S; Yao Y; Zhou Y; Li S; Li J; Liu Y
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2022; 2022():6302751. PubMed ID: 35321515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Accurate grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 index in fine-needle aspiration specimens: a comparative cytologic and histologic study].
He SR; Cui D; Gong H; Zhu YP; Chen L; Hu ST; Liu DG
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 46(6):393-399. PubMed ID: 28591986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of cytologic grading in prognostication of invasive breast carcinoma.
Khan N; Afroz N; Rana F; Khan M
J Cytol; 2009 Apr; 26(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 21938155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma with histological correlation.
Milentijević MJ; Ilić R; Milentijević I
J BUON; 2005; 10(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 17343338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cytological grading, apoptosis, and Bcl-2 protein expression in breast cancer.
Hemachandran M; Nijhawan R; Joshi K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jun; 26(6):356-9. PubMed ID: 12112824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using Ki-67 index and 2017 World Health Organization criteria: An analysis of 32 cases.
Kalantri S; Bakshi P; Verma K
Cytojournal; 2020; 17():21. PubMed ID: 33093857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytologic evaluation of prognostic markers in breast carcinoma.
Jayaram G; Elsayed EM
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):605-10. PubMed ID: 16450899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correlation of Nuclear Morphometry with Clinicopathologic Parameters in Malignant Breast Aspirates.
Kalhan S; Garg S; Satarkar R; Sharma P; Hasija S; Sharma S
South Asian J Cancer; 2021 Apr; 10(2):64-68. PubMed ID: 34568216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of Nuclear Morphometry in Breast Cancer and its Correlation with Cytomorphological Grading of Breast Cancer: A Study of 64 Cases.
Kashyap A; Jain M; Shukla S; Andley M
J Cytol; 2018; 35(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 29403169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparative and evaluative study of cytological and histological grading system profile in malignant neoplasm of breast--an important prognostic factor.
Meena SP; Hemrajani DK; Joshi N
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 49(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 16933714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
