These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38377323)

  • 1. The Myth of MARD (
    Vigersky RA; Shin J
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2024 Mar; 26(S3):38-44. PubMed ID: 38377323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy and Safety of an Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: The PRECISION Study.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Bailey TS; Brazg R; Carlson G; Tweden KS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 May; 21(5):231-237. PubMed ID: 30925083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Novel Implanted Continuous Glucose Sensor: PRECISE II.
    Christiansen MP; Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Chang AR; Levy CJ; Lam D; Denham DS; Atiee G; Bode BW; Walters SJ; Kelley L; Bailey TS
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Mar; 20(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 29381090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
    Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life.
    Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Zschornack E; Klötzer HM; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 23911164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of factors that determine the mean absolute relative difference in flash glucose monitoring with reference to plasma glucose levels in Japanese subjects without diabetes.
    Yoshino S; Yamada E; Okada S; Nakajima Y; Shibusawa R; Uehara R; Matsumoto S; Horiguchi K; Ishida E; Saito T; Yamada M
    Endocr J; 2020 May; 67(5):537-544. PubMed ID: 32023588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
    Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and Safety of the 15-Day CareSens Air Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Kim KS; Lee SH; Yoo WS; Park CY
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2024 Apr; 26(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 38133642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative sensor-based method for glucose monitoring in children and young people with diabetes.
    Edge J; Acerini C; Campbell F; Hamilton-Shield J; Moudiotis C; Rahman S; Randell T; Smith A; Trevelyan N
    Arch Dis Child; 2017 Jun; 102(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 28137708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: The Effect of Sensor Age.
    Tsoukas M; Rutkowski J; El-Fathi A; Yale JF; Bernier-Twardy S; Bossy A; Pytka E; Legault L; Haidar A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Mar; 22(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 31613140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuous glucose monitoring accuracy results vary between assessment at home and assessment at the clinical research center.
    Luijf YM; Avogaro A; Benesch C; Bruttomesso D; Cobelli C; Ellmerer M; Heinemann L; Mader JK; DeVries JH;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1103-6. PubMed ID: 23063036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Sensors in People with Diabetes Undergoing Hemodialysis (ALPHA Study).
    Avari P; Tang W; Jugnee N; Hersi I; Al-Balah A; Tan T; Frankel AH; Oliver N; Reddy M
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2023 Jul; 25(7):447-456. PubMed ID: 36961385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous glucose monitoring in the subcutaneous tissue over a 14-day sensor wear period.
    Hoss U; Budiman ES; Liu H; Christiansen MP
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1210-9. PubMed ID: 24124948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pediatric Participants With Type 1 Diabetes.
    Welsh JB; Zhang X; Puhr SA; Johnson TK; Walker TC; Balo AK; Price D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 13(2):254-258. PubMed ID: 30198331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space.
    Heinemann L; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Hinzmann R; Kassab A; Freckmann G; Reiterer F; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 14(1):135-150. PubMed ID: 31216870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.