132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38377777)
21. Endometrial cancer risk factors, treatment, and survival outcomes as per the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) - European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) - European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) risk groups and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging: An experience from developing world.
Gupta N; Pandey A; Dimri K; Sehgal A; Bhagat R; Suraj ; Gill G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):701-707. PubMed ID: 37470597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Restaging and Survival Analysis of 4036 Ovarian Cancer Patients According to the 2013 FIGO Classification for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.
Rosendahl M; Høgdall CK; Mosgaard BJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 26937751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stage Migration in Cervical Cancer Using the FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Retrospective Survival Analysis Using a Single-Institution Patient Cohort.
Vengaloor Thomas T; Reddy KK; Gandhi S; Nittala MR; Abraham A; Robinson W; Ridgway M; Packianathan S; Vijayakumar S
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19289. PubMed ID: 34877225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adjuvant treatment and outcomes for patients with stage IIIA grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Montes de Oca MK; Albright BB; Secord AA; Havrilesky LJ; Moss HA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Dec; 31(12):1549-1556. PubMed ID: 34725205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic Analysis and Comparison of the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System on Overall Survival in Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervix Carcinoma.
Song T; Xu H; Shi L; Yan S
Int J Womens Health; 2022; 14():333-344. PubMed ID: 35283649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems.
Zivanovic O; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Jacks LM; Zhou Q; Abu-Rustum NR; Soslow RA; Juretzka MM; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 19255317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.
Padilla-Iserte P; Lago V; Tauste C; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver R; Coronado P; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Gilabert-Estellés J; Lorenzo C; Cazorla E; Roldán-Rivas F; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Sánchez L; Muruzábal JC; Hervas D; Domingo S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):65.e1-65.e11. PubMed ID: 32693096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A retrospective study for investigating the relationship between old and new staging systems with prognosis in ovarian cancer using gynecologic cancer registry of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG): disparity between serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma.
Yamagami W; Nagase S; Takahashi F; Ino K; Hachisuga T; Mikami M; Enomoto T; Katabuchi H; Aoki D
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 31(4):e45. PubMed ID: 32026659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does the FIGO 2009 endometrial cancer staging system more accurately correlate with clinical outcome in different histologies? Revised staging, endometrial cancer, histology.
Page BR; Pappas L; Cooke EW; Gaffney DK
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 22343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term survival in patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis with systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma.
Hiura M; Nogawa T; Matsumoto T; Yokoyama T; Shiroyama Y; Wroblewski J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1000-5. PubMed ID: 20683408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. International Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: estimation of survival in patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer.
Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Peregrin I; Mendizabal E; Ortiz-Quintana L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25405578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic impact of the subclassification of Müllerian cancer stage IV in the FIGO 2014 staging system with a focus of extra-abdominal lymph node metastases.
Yasunaga M; Yahata H; Okugawa K; Hori E; Kodama K; Yagi H; Ohgami T; Onoyama I; Asanoma K; Kato K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Jul; 26(7):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 33786711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type.
Toptas T; Pestereli E; Erol O; Bozkurt S; Erdogan G; Simsek T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jul; 26(6):1012-9. PubMed ID: 27206284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the extent of lymphadenectomy a prognostic factor in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer?
Cuylan ZF; Akilli H; Gungorduk K; Demirkiran F; Oz M; Salman MC; Sozen H; Celik H; Gokcu M; Bese T; Meydanli MM; Ozgul N; Topuz S; Kuscu E; Kuru O; Gokmen S; Gultekin M; Ayhan A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Mar; 47(3):1134-1144. PubMed ID: 33426779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Clinical application of adult comorbidity evaluation-27 in endometrial cancer].
Tian WY; Wang YM; Yan Y; Gao JP; Sun DD; Jiang S; Sheng Y; Teng F; Xue FX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):810-817. PubMed ID: 27916063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptions of Controversies and Unresolved Issues in the 2014 FIGO Staging System for Endometrial Cancer: Survey Results From Members of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists and International Gynecologic Cancer Society.
Kayraklioglu N; Katsakhyan L; Cohen PA; Singh N; Rabban JT; Matias-Guiu X
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2024 May; 43(3):242-252. PubMed ID: 37668357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The value of exploratory laparotomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging.
Vardi JR; Tadros GH; Anselmo MT; Rafla SD
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 1635733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Verification of the prognostic precision of the new 2023 FIGO staging system in endometrial cancer patients - An international pooled analysis of three ESGO accredited centres.
Schwameis R; Fanfani F; Ebner C; Zimmermann N; Peters I; Nero C; Marth C; Ristl R; Leitner K; Grimm C; Oberndorfer F; Capasso I; Zeimet AG; Polterauer S; Scambia G; Fagotti A; Concin N
Eur J Cancer; 2023 Nov; 193():113317. PubMed ID: 37748967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic value of different metastatic sites for patients with FIGO stage IVB endometrial cancer after surgery: A SEER database analysis.
Li H; Zhang R; Chen C; Wu C; Lin H; Li J; Lin Z
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 122(5):941-948. PubMed ID: 32682330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic cancers: long-term follow-up of 355 patients.
Zuna RE; Behrens A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Jul; 88(14):980-7. PubMed ID: 8667429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
