126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38378417)
21. Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison with histologic findings.
Bianchi PP; Ceriani C; Rottoli M; Torzilli G; Pompili G; Malesci A; Ferraroni M; Montorsi M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2005 Dec; 9(9):1222-7; discussion 1227-8. PubMed ID: 16332477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer.
Guo J; Wang Z; Qin J; Zhang H; Liu W; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Yan X; Zhang Z; Zhang T; Zhang S; Dominik NM; Kamel IR; Li H; Qu J
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):64. PubMed ID: 32912319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Fujimori N; Osoegawa T; Lee L; Tachibana Y; Aso A; Kubo H; Kawabe K; Igarashi H; Nakamura K; Oda Y; Ito T
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26513346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grading.
Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Asama H; Takasumi M; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 21(26):8118-24. PubMed ID: 26185384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external anal sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging.
West RL; Dwarkasing S; Briel JW; Hansen BE; Hussain SM; Schouten WR; Kuipers EJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jul; 20(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 15666154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Localisation of neuroendocrine tumours of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Zimmer T; Ziegler K; Bäder M; Fett U; Hamm B; Riecken EO; Wiedenmann B
Gut; 1994 Apr; 35(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 8174983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Linear endoscopic ultrasonography vs magnetic resonance imaging in ampullary tumors.
Manta R; Conigliaro R; Castellani D; Messerotti A; Bertani H; Sabatino G; Vetruccio E; Losi L; Villanacci V; Bassotti G
World J Gastroenterol; 2010 Nov; 16(44):5592-7. PubMed ID: 21105192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endoscopic ultrasonography of neuroendocrine tumours.
Zimmer T; Scherübl H; Faiss S; Stölzel U; Riecken EO; Wiedenmann B
Digestion; 2000; 62 Suppl 1():45-50. PubMed ID: 10940687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Tumor staging and follow-up care in rectosigmoid carcinoma: colonoscopic endosonography compared to CT, MRI and endorectal MRI].
Meyenberger C; Wildi S; Külling D; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1996 May; 85(19):622-31. PubMed ID: 8693230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms.
Cannon ME; Carpenter SL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Kochman ML; Ginsberg GG; Stotland B; Rosato EF; Morris JB; Eckhauser F; Scheiman JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Jul; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 10385718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals.
Harinck F; Konings IC; Kluijt I; Poley JW; van Hooft JE; van Dullemen HM; Nio CY; Krak NC; Hermans JJ; Aalfs CM; Wagner A; Sijmons RH; Biermann K; van Eijck CH; Gouma DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Fockens P; Bruno MJ;
Gut; 2016 Sep; 65(9):1505-13. PubMed ID: 25986944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of pancreatic cancer.
Shami VM; Mahajan A; Loch MM; Stella AC; Northup PG; White GE; Brock AS; Srinivasan I; de Lange EE; Kahaleh M
Pancreas; 2011 May; 40(4):567-70. PubMed ID: 21499211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pancreas Cystic Lesions.
Lee YS; Paik KH; Kim HW; Lee JC; Kim J; Hwang JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(41):e1666. PubMed ID: 26469901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sensitivity of CT, MRI, and EUS-FNA/B in the preoperative workup of histologically proven left-sided pancreatic lesions.
Gorris M; Janssen QP; Besselink MG; van den Broek BLJ; van Eijck CHJ; van Gils MJ; Koerkamp BG; Struik F; van Driel LMJW; van Hooft JE
Pancreatology; 2022 Jan; 22(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 34857486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.
Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI.
Chen CH; Yang CC; Yeh YH; Chou DA; Nien CK
J Clin Ultrasound; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18726967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review.
Kwee RM; Kwee TC
J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 25(15):2107-16. PubMed ID: 17513817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)/endoscopic ultrasound--fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology in solid and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Mitra V; Nayar MK; Leeds JS; Wadehra V; Haugk B; Scott J; Charnley RM; Oppong KW
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2015 Mar; 24(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25822436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography, multi-slice spiral CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of TNM staging and assessment of resectability in pancreatic carcinoma].
Tian YT; Wang CF; Shan Y; Zhao DB; Wang GQ; Zhao XM; Ouyang H; Hao YZ; Sun YM; Qu H; Zhao P
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 88(40):2829-32. PubMed ID: 19080491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
