These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3837875)

  • 1. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2002; 31(8):985-94. PubMed ID: 12269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of external and internal features to the matching of unfamiliar faces.
    Nachson I; Moscovitch M; Umilta C
    Psychol Res; 1995; 58(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 7675930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
    Brooks KR; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Configurational information in face perception.
    Young AW; Hellawell D; Hay DC
    Perception; 1987; 16(6):747-59. PubMed ID: 3454432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.
    Kramer RSS; Manesi Z; Towler A; Reynolds MG; Burton AM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28803526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repetition priming of face recognition in a serial choice reaction-time task.
    Roberts T; Bruce V
    Br J Psychol; 1989 May; 80 ( Pt 2)():201-11. PubMed ID: 2736340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition priming from incomplete faces: evidence for part to whole completion.
    Brunas J; Young AW; Ellis AW
    Br J Psychol; 1990 Feb; 81 ( Pt 1)():43-56. PubMed ID: 2322764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
    Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of changes in visible area on facial recognition.
    Inui T; Miyamoto K
    Perception; 1984; 13(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 6473051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.