158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38380153)
1. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic comparison of different modelling approaches.
Kåstad Høiskar M; Sæther O; Delange Alsaker M; Røe Redalen K; Winter RM
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jan; 29():100548. PubMed ID: 38380153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Arterial Input Function and Pharmacokinetic Models on DCE-MRI Biomarkers for Detection of Vascular Effect Induced by Stroma-Directed Drug in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer.
Cao J; Pickup S; Rosen M; Zhou R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2023 Aug; 25(4):638-647. PubMed ID: 37166575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer.
Dong W; Volk A; Djaroum M; Girot C; Balleyguier C; Lebon V; Garcia G; Ammari S; Temam S; Gorphe P; Wei L; Pitre-Champagnat S; Lassau N; Bidault F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 36269053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Relationship Between Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Parameters and Pathological Characteristics in Breast Cancer.
Kang SR; Kim HW; Kim HS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 52(5):1360-1373. PubMed ID: 32524658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases.
Shukla-Dave A; Lee N; Stambuk H; Wang Y; Huang W; Thaler HT; Patel SG; Shah JP; Koutcher JA
BMC Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19351382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The arterial input function: Spatial dependence within the imaging volume and its influence on 3D quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for head and neck cancer.
Roberts J; Kim SE; Kholmovski EG; Hitchcock Y; Richards TJ; Anzai Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():40-46. PubMed ID: 37030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the activity staging of terminal ileum Crohn's disease.
Wu YC; Xiao ZB; Lin XH; Zheng XY; Cao DR; Zhang ZS
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Oct; 26(39):6057-6073. PubMed ID: 33132655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Interstitial Fractional Volume Quantification by Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Porcine Skeletal Muscles.
Hindel S; Söhner A; Maa M; Sauerwein W; Baba HA; Kramer M; Lüdemann L
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jan; 52(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 27482651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-temporal resolution DCE-MRI improves assessment of intra- and peri-breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4.
Liu Y; Wang S; Qu J; Tang R; Wang C; Xiao F; Pang P; Sun Z; Xu M; Li J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 37076817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer.
Meng R; Chang SD; Jones EC; Goldenberg SL; Kozlowski P
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):520-5. PubMed ID: 20074982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
