336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38380431)
41. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Villavicencio AT; Burneikiene S; Roeca CM; Nelson EL; Mason A
Surg Neurol Int; 2010 May; 1():12. PubMed ID: 20657693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparative study on the technique and efficacy of microscope-assisted MI-TLIF and naked-eye MI-TLIF in lumbar revision surgery.
Zhang J; Yuan Y; Gao H; Liao B; Qian J; Yan X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 38297343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease.
Kong X; Li B; Xu L; Li J; Gao C; Wu D; Ma S; Song Y; Zhao J; Wang X
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1617-1626. PubMed ID: 37199023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Jover-Mendiola AD; Lopez-Prats FA; Lizaur-Utrilla A; Vizcaya-Moreno MF
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 37008969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Hoffmann CH; Kandziora F
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Jun; 32(3):180-191. PubMed ID: 32447419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion enhanced the recovery of patients with the lumbar degenerative disease compared with the conventional posterior procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang H; Cheng F; Hai Y; Liu Y; Pan A
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():1089981. PubMed ID: 36703632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.
Lin GX; Akbary K; Kotheeranurak V; Quillo-Olvera J; Jo HJ; Yang XW; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e898-e909. PubMed ID: 30099187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. 3-Dimensionally Printed Biomimetic Surgical Simulation-Operative Technique of a Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.
Clifton W; Damon A; Nottmeier E; Pichelmann M
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Aug; 19(2):E153. PubMed ID: 31828347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort.
Dibble CF; Zhang JK; Greenberg JK; Javeed S; Khalifeh JM; Jain D; Dorward I; Santiago P; Molina C; Pennicooke B; Ray WZ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 35276656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
Epstein NE
Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Different lumbar fusion techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Li W; Wei H; Zhang R
BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):345. PubMed ID: 37968633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The "TFP" fusion technique for posterior 360° lumbar fusion: a combination of open decompression, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and facet fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
Rao PJ; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2014 Feb; 6(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24590995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gao QY; Wei FL; Li T; Zhu KL; Du MR; Heng W; Yang F; Gao HR; Qian JX; Zhou CP
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():829426. PubMed ID: 35665352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
