116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38382701)
1. DXA-based statistical models of shape and intensity outperform aBMD hip fracture prediction: A retrospective study.
Aldieri A; Paggiosi M; Eastell R; Bignardi C; Audenino AL; Bhattacharya P; Terzini M
Bone; 2024 May; 182():117051. PubMed ID: 38382701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.
Iki M; Winzenrieth R; Tamaki J; Sato Y; Dongmei N; Kajita E; Kouda K; Yura A; Tachiki T; Kamiya K; Kagamimori S
Osteoporos Int; 2021 Nov; 32(11):2289-2299. PubMed ID: 34041560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the Hip Fracture Risk Prediction with a Statistical Shape-and-Intensity Model of the Proximal Femur.
Aldieri A; Bhattacharya P; Paggiosi M; Eastell R; Audenino AL; Bignardi C; Morbiducci U; Terzini M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Feb; 50(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 35044572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.
Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining shape and intensity dxa-based statistical approaches for osteoporotic HIP fracture risk assessment.
Aldieri A; Terzini M; Audenino AL; Bignardi C; Morbiducci U
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Dec; 127():104093. PubMed ID: 33130436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D Finite Element Models Reconstructed From 2D Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Images Improve Hip Fracture Prediction Compared to Areal BMD in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden Cohort.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Jehpsson L; Ljunggren Ö; Rosengren BE; Karlsson MK; Isaksson H
J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1258-1267. PubMed ID: 37417707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hip Fracture Discrimination Based on Statistical Multi-parametric Modeling (SMPM).
Carballido-Gamio J; Yu A; Wang L; Su Y; Burghardt AJ; Lang TF; Cheng X
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Nov; 47(11):2199-2212. PubMed ID: 31240508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration.
Whitmarsh T; Fritscher KD; Humbert L; del Río Barquero LM; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Frangi AF
Bone; 2012 Nov; 51(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 22959281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants.
Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine: a case-control study.
López Picazo M; Humbert L; Winzenrieth R; Di Gregorio S; González Ballester MA; Del Río Barquero LM
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 31897775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.
Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture risk predictions based on statistical shape and density modeling of the proximal femur.
Bredbenner TL; Mason RL; Havill LM; Orwoll ES; Nicolella DP;
J Bone Miner Res; 2014 Sep; 29(9):2090-100. PubMed ID: 24692132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone mineral content and areal density, but not bone area, predict an incident fracture risk: a comparative study in a UK prospective cohort.
Curtis EM; Harvey NC; D'Angelo S; Cooper CS; Ward KA; Taylor P; Pearson G; Cooper C
Arch Osteoporos; 2016 Dec; 11(1):39. PubMed ID: 27915448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an open-source measurement system to assess the areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur from clinical CT images.
Uemura K; Otake Y; Takao M; Makino H; Soufi M; Iwasa M; Sugano N; Sato Y
Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Jan; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 35038079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poor correlation of mid-femoral measurements by CT and hip measurements by DXA in the elderly.
Taaffe DR; Lang TF; Harris TB
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2003 Apr; 15(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 12889844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of 3D Geometric Measures Derived From Quantitative Computed Tomography With Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men.
Borggrefe J; de Buhr T; Shrestha S; Marshall LM; Orwoll E; Peters K; Black DM; Glüer CC;
J Bone Miner Res; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1550-8. PubMed ID: 26916713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical bone structure of the proximal femur and incident fractures.
Nissen FI; Andreasen C; Borgen TT; Bjørnerem Å; Hansen AK
Bone; 2022 Feb; 155():116284. PubMed ID: 34875395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk.
Roberts BJ; Thrall E; Muller JA; Bouxsein ML
Bone; 2010 Mar; 46(3):742-6. PubMed ID: 19854307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
