141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38382736)
1. Proposed Diagnostic Reference Levels in the Missouri/Southern Illinois Region Associated with Cone-beam Computed Tomography Use in Endodontics.
Popkowski A; Rhodes SC; Hatton JF
J Endod; 2024 Jul; 50(7):966-975. PubMed ID: 38382736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose indices in dental cone beam CT and correlation with dose-area product.
Araki K; Patil S; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120362. PubMed ID: 23520392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels in dental cone beam computed tomography in Switzerland.
Deleu M; Dagassan D; Berg I; Bize J; Dula K; Lenoir V; Ott B; Ott JG; Verdun FR; Weber R; Ziglinas P; Zingariello C; Sans Merce M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190468. PubMed ID: 32267774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of patient dose received during cone-beam computed tomography in relation to scan settings and imaging indications as seen in a dental institution in order to establish institutional diagnostic reference levels.
Hung KF; Hui L; Yeung AWK; Jacobs R; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(5):20200529. PubMed ID: 35230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Performance Characterization of Radiation Dose for the Carestream CS9600 Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Machine.
Davis TA; Rhodes SC; Hatton JF; Khademi JA
J Endod; 2021 Jan; 47(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 32979435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT.
Orhan K; Pauwels R; Chen Y; Song D; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Jul; 50(5):20200372. PubMed ID: 33353401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cloud-fog software architecture for dental CBCT dose monitoring using the DICOM structured report: Automated establishment of DRL.
Esmaeilyfard R; Samanipour A; Paknahad M
Phys Med; 2021 Sep; 89():147-150. PubMed ID: 34365119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging dose estimation and optimization: Need of daily cone-beam computed tomography.
Trivedi G; Dixit CK; Oinam AS; Kapoor R; Bahl A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(3):470-474. PubMed ID: 31169206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in the United Arab Emirates.
Abuzaid MM; Elshami W; Jayachandran D; Korappil N; Tekin HO
Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2939-2945. PubMed ID: 36548539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IAEA survey of dental cone beam computed tomography practice and related patient exposure in nine Central and Eastern European countries.
Beganović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Dyakov I; Gershan V; Kralik I; Milatović A; Šalát D; Stepanyan K; Vladimirov A; Vassileva J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(8):20190157. PubMed ID: 31530009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective doses of dental cone beam computed tomography: effect of 360-degree versus 180-degree rotation angles.
Mutalik S; Tadinada A; Molina MR; Sinisterra A; Lurie A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 130(4):433-446. PubMed ID: 32616450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preliminary study to determine the diagnostic reference level using dose-area product for limited-area cone beam CT.
Endo A; Katoh T; Vasudeva SB; Kobayashi I; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(4):20120097. PubMed ID: 23420859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EXTRAORAL AND CBCT DENTAL EXPOSURES IN PORTUGAL.
Trindade H; Morais I; Moreira A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Sep; 190(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 32779714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
