These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38383427)

  • 41. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
    Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Development of a New Scoring System To Accurately Estimate Learning Outcome Achievements via Single, Best-Answer, Multiple-Choice Questions for Preclinical Students in a Medical Microbiology Course.
    Dangprapai Y; Ngamskulrungroj P; Senawong S; Ungprasert P; Harun A
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2020; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 32148605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
    Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
    Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.
    Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality.
    Naeem N; van der Vleuten C; Alfaris EA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 21837548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quantitative analysis of single best answer multiple choice questions in pharmaceutics.
    Al Muhaissen SA; Ratka A; Akour A; AlKhatib HS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Mar; 11(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30904146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Multi-institutional Study of the Feasibility and Reliability of the Implementation of Constructed Response Exam Questions.
    Olvet DM; Bird JB; Fulton TB; Kruidering M; Papp KK; Qua K; Willey JM; Brenner JM
    Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(5):609-622. PubMed ID: 35989668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development and Test-Item Analysis of a Freely Available 1900-Item Question Bank for Rheumatology Trainees.
    Kumar B; Suneja M; Swee ML
    Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e18382. PubMed ID: 34646714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.
    Madhav VN
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 26522636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Post-validation item analysis to assess the validity and reliability of multiple-choice questions at a medical college with an innovative curriculum.
    Yahia AIO
    Natl Med J India; 2021; 34(6):359-362. PubMed ID: 35818102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Knierim A; Hayes SK; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2006 Dec; 6(6):354-63. PubMed ID: 19040902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Item analysis of examinations in the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.
    Hermi A; Achour W
    Tunis Med; 2016 Apr; 94(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 27704506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stepping up of MCQs' quality through a multi-stage reviewing process.
    Khafagy G; Ahmed M; Saad N
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Jul; 27(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 27315633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of changing multiple choice questions from "all of the above" to "select all that apply".
    Dell KA; DeVries DM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2024 Mar; 16(3):174-177. PubMed ID: 38218657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Is the formal quality of multiple choice questions used for continuing medical education influenced by guidelines for authors provided by the publishing houses?].
    Drossard S; Bauer D; Fischer M; Kühne-Eversmann L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Apr; 121():29-35. PubMed ID: 28416209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.