These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38383912)

  • 1. The effect of tongue reduction for preventing adverse effects in patients undergoing class III orthognathic surgery: a three-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Jeong BJ; Ohe JY; Ryu JI; Choi BJ; Jung J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Feb; 28(3):162. PubMed ID: 38383912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
    Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tongue Size and Posterior Airway Space Changes in Class III Malocclusion After Maxillomandibular Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
    Uslu-Akcam O; Gokalp H
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 27029091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of condylar surface CT values related to condylar height reduction after orthognathic surgery.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Saito Y; Takayama A; Baba N; Kimura Y; Koizumi M; Fujimoto K; Iguchi R; Sato M; Osada AH; Moroi A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 49(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 33994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early and 1-year postsurgical stability and its factors in patients with complicated skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion treated by conventional and surgery-first approach: A prospective cohort study.
    Jiang Y; Yang Z; Qi Y; Peng J; Li Z; Liu X; Yi B; Wang X; Chen G; Han B; Xu T; Jiang R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):728-740. PubMed ID: 37516951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional quantitative changes of condyle in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with 5-year follow-up.
    Wang Z; Shi Y; Wang Y; Chen W; Jiang H; Cheng J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4061-4071. PubMed ID: 37145152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular stability and condylar changes following orthognathic surgery in mandibular hypoplasia patients associated with preoperative condylar resorption.
    Wang M; Qian Y; Zhao H; Zhu M; Yu H; Shen SG
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Dec; 26(12):7083-7093. PubMed ID: 36151404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
    Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.
    Yoo JY; Kwon YD; Suh JH; Ko SJ; Lee B; Lee JW; Kim EC; Girod S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 23538214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a 12-year follow-up.
    Eggensperger N; Raditsch T; Taghizadeh F; Iizuka T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 16191914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
    Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of mandibular proximal segment rotations on skeletal relapse and condylar remodelling following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
    Xi T; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1716-22. PubMed ID: 26321064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remodeling of the Temporomandibular Joint After Mandibular Setback Surgery: A 3D Cephalometric Analysis.
    Naik KY; Lee KC; Rekawek P; Zoida J; Torroni A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Nov; 81(11):1353-1359. PubMed ID: 37640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bimaxillary surgery on adaptive condylar head remodeling: metric analysis and image interpretation using cone-beam computed tomography volume superimposition.
    Park SB; Yang YM; Kim YI; Cho BH; Jung YH; Hwang DS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1951-9. PubMed ID: 22104132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative stability after setback of sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison of three techniques.
    Byeon KS; Lee YJ; Yoon YJ; Hong SM; Park YH; Choi DJ; Park JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 23083507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the changes in condylar long axis according to asymmetric setback in sagittal split ramus osteotomy patients.
    Lim SY; Jiang T; Oh MH; Kook MS; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 28253453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in Condylar Position Within 12 Months After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With and Without Le Fort I Osteotomy by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Han Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 80(1):162-173. PubMed ID: 34547267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-Dimensional Changes in the Mandibular Proximal Segment After Using a Surgery-First Approach in Patients With Class III Malocclusion and Facial Asymmetry.
    Kim M; Jha N; Choi JH; Kim YJ; Lee U; Cevidanes L; Choi JY; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1956-1961. PubMed ID: 35175981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional condylar displacement and remodelling in patients with asymmetrical mandibular prognathism following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Abotaleb BM; Bi R; Liu Y; Jiang N; Telha W; Zhu S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 51(4):509-517. PubMed ID: 34446294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.