These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38384249)

  • 41. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
    Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Birthweight percentiles by gestational age for births following assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2010.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1787-800. PubMed ID: 24908671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Major congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study 1995-2006.
    Pelkonen S; Hartikainen AL; Ritvanen A; Koivunen R; Martikainen H; Gissler M; Tiitinen A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1552-7. PubMed ID: 24812318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cardiac remodeling in fetuses conceived by ARTs: fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.
    Boutet ML; Casals G; Valenzuela-Alcaraz B; García-Otero L; Crovetto F; Cívico MS; Borrás A; Manau D; Gratacós E; Crispi F
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Sep; 36(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 34323946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer-a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomes.
    Mendes Godinho C; Soares SR; Nunes SG; Martínez JMM; Santos-Ribeiro S
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 38531673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.
    Mak W; Kondapalli LA; Celia G; Gordon J; DiMattina M; Payson M
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Apr; 31(4):789-94. PubMed ID: 26908846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Elective freezing of embryos versus fresh embryo transfer in IVF: a multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK (E-Freeze).
    Maheshwari A; Bell JL; Bhide P; Brison D; Child T; Chong HY; Cheong Y; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Hardy P; Hamoda H; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Linsell L; Macklon N; Mathur R; Pundir J; Raine-Fenning N; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Stanbury K; Troup S; Bhattacharya S
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):476-487. PubMed ID: 34999830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Busnelli A; Schirripa I; Fedele F; Bulfoni A; Levi-Setti PE
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 37(7):1619-1641. PubMed ID: 35553678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Childhood BMI after ART with frozen embryo transfer.
    Asserhøj LL; Mizrak I; Heldarskard GF; Clausen TD; Hoffmann ER; Greisen G; Main KM; Madsen PL; Jensen RB; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Aug; 38(8):1578-1589. PubMed ID: 37349895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Higher risk of pre-eclampsia and other vascular disorders with artificial cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer compared to ovulatory cycle or to fresh embryo transfer following
    Epelboin S; Labrosse J; De Mouzon J; Devaux A; Gervoise-Boyer MJ; Hesters L; Jonveaux P; Levy R; Sermondade N; Fauque P; Pessione F
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1182148. PubMed ID: 37284215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. No major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes between uninterrupted embryo culture in time-lapse system and conventional embryo culture.
    Ahlström A; Lundin K; Cimadomo D; Coticchio G; Selleskog U; Westlander G; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Callender S; Nyberg C; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Nolte L; Sundler M; Kitlinski M; Liljeqvist Soltic I; Bohlin T; Baumgart J; Lindgren KE; Gülen Yaldir F; Rienzi L; Lind AK; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2400-2411. PubMed ID: 37879843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues.
    Montagut M; Santos-Ribeiro S; De Vos M; Polyzos NP; Drakopoulos P; Mackens S; van de Vijver A; van Landuyt L; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Blockeel C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2803-2810. PubMed ID: 27798046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cardiovascular function in 8- to 9-year-old singletons born after ART with frozen and fresh embryo transfer.
    Mizrak I; Asserhøj LL; Lund MAV; Kielstrup LR; Greisen G; Clausen TD; Main KM; Jensen RB; Vejlstrup NG; Madsen PL; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):600-611. PubMed ID: 35015837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of different frozen embryo transfer regimens on abnormalities of fetal weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rosalik K; Carson S; Pilgrim J; Luizzi J; Levy G; Heitmann R; Pier B
    Hum Reprod Update; 2021 Dec; 28(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 34865039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dydrogesterone and 20α-dihydrodydrogesterone plasma levels on day of embryo transfer and clinical outcome in an anovulatory programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: a prospective cohort study.
    Neumann K; Masuch A; Vonthein R; Depenbusch M; Schultze-Mosgau A; Eggersmann TK; Griesinger G
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1183-1193. PubMed ID: 35323905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. What was the fate of human embryos following long-term cryopreservation (≥12 years) and frozen embryo transfer?
    Yuan Y; Mai Q; Ma J; Deng M; Xu Y; Zhuang G; Zhou C
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):52-55. PubMed ID: 30517678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.
    Van Montfoort APA; Arts EGJM; Wijnandts L; Sluijmer A; Pelinck MJ; Land JA; Van Echten-Arends J
    Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(1):hoz036. PubMed ID: 31989044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a natural or mildly hormonally stimulated cycle in women with regular ovulatory cycles: a RCT.
    Peeraer K; Couck I; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2552-62. PubMed ID: 26364081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
    Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. High FSH dosing is associated with reduced live birth rate in fresh but not subsequent frozen embryo transfers.
    Munch EM; Sparks AE; Zimmerman MB; Van Voorhis BJ; Duran EH
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1402-1409. PubMed ID: 28472321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.