These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38384346)

  • 1. Sustained training with novel distractors attenuates the behavioral interference of emotional pictures but does not affect the electrocortical markers of emotional processing.
    Ferrari V; Canturi F; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1322792. PubMed ID: 38384346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual Modulation of Emotional Distraction: Attentional Capture and Motivational Significance.
    Micucci A; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 31765599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus novelty and emotionality interact in the processing of visual distractors.
    Ferrari V; Canturi F; Codispoti M
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Jan; 167():108238. PubMed ID: 34864068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The fate of unattended stimuli and emotional habituation: Behavioral interference and cortical changes.
    Codispoti M; De Cesarei A; Biondi S; Ferrari V
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):1063-1073. PubMed ID: 27557884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Habituation to emotional distractors attenuates emotion-induced blindness.
    Jia L; Wang L; Sung B; Wang C; Chen D; Wang J
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 36006702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alpha-band oscillations and emotion: A review of studies on picture perception.
    Codispoti M; De Cesarei A; Ferrari V
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14438. PubMed ID: 37724827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nx4 Reduced Susceptibility to Distraction in an Attention Modulation Task.
    Mayer K; Krylova M; Alizadeh S; Jamalabadi H; van der Meer J; Vester JC; Naschold B; Schultz M; Walter M
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():746215. PubMed ID: 34912250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orbitofrontal cortex biases attention to emotional events.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Knight RT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2012; 34(6):588-97. PubMed ID: 22413757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional Picture Perception: Repetition Effects in Free-Viewing and during an Explicit Categorization Task.
    Mastria S; Ferrari V; Codispoti M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1001. PubMed ID: 28725202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proactive Control of Emotional Distraction: Evidence From EEG Alpha Suppression.
    Murphy J; Devue C; Corballis PM; Grimshaw GM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():318. PubMed ID: 33013338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interplay between attention and long-term memory in affective habituation.
    Ferrari V; Mastria S; Codispoti M
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jun; 57(6):e13572. PubMed ID: 32239721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
    Ding LJ; Zhang SS; Peng M; Li X
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Nov; 10(1):251. PubMed ID: 36333780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time will tell: Object categorization and emotional engagement during processing of degraded natural scenes.
    Codispoti M; Micucci A; De Cesarei A
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; ():e13704. PubMed ID: 33090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect.
    Madill M; Murray JE
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():591. PubMed ID: 28450848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive cognitive control attenuates the late positive potential to emotional distractors.
    Flaisch T; Steinhauser M; Schupp HT
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 200():51-58. PubMed ID: 31226493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-Related Developmental and Individual Differences in the Influence of Social and Non-social Distractors on Cognitive Performance.
    Tan PZ; Silk JS; Dahl RE; Kronhaus D; Ladouceur CD
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():863. PubMed ID: 29937742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single dose testosterone administration modulates the temporal dynamics of distractor processing.
    Fang H; Li X; Wu Y; Peng W
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Nov; 121():104838. PubMed ID: 32871336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by simultaneous pleasant and unpleasant emotional distractors.
    Padmala S; Sambuco N; Codispoti M; Pessoa L
    Emotion; 2018 Dec; 18(8):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 29494204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.