These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38384680)
1. Comparison of daily step count between the Fitbit Inspire 3 and the activPAL 3 in adults with transtibial amputation. Leister KR; Burke SE; Kim JY; Duenas VH; Barreira TV Front Rehabil Sci; 2024; 5():1331005. PubMed ID: 38384680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Step count accuracy of StepWatch and FitBit One™ among individuals with a unilateral transtibial amputation. Arch ES; Sions JM; Horne J; Bodt BA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):518-526. PubMed ID: 29623810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the ActivPAL and Fitbit Charge 2 in measuring step count in Cystic Fibrosis. Curran M; Tierney A; Collins L; Kennedy L; McDonnell C; Sheikhi A; Walsh C; Casserly B; Cahalan R Physiother Theory Pract; 2022 Nov; 38(13):2962-2972. PubMed ID: 34369283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of the Paul SS; Tiedemann A; Hassett LM; Ramsay E; Kirkham C; Chagpar S; Sherrington C BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2015; 1(1):e000013. PubMed ID: 27900119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Sedentary Behavior as Measured by the Fitbit and ActivPAL in College Students. Carpenter C; Yang CH; West D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33917879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts. Maganja SA; Clarke DC; Lear SA; Mackey DC JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16537. PubMed ID: 32651956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions. Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study. Ummels D; Beekman E; Theunissen K; Braun S; Beurskens AJ JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e70. PubMed ID: 29610110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. Katzan I; Schuster A; Kinzy T JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e14494. PubMed ID: 33464213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia. Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of Fitbit's active minutes as compared with a research-grade accelerometer and self-reported measures. Brewer W; Swanson BT; Ortiz A BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2017; 3(1):e000254. PubMed ID: 29018543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and Precision of Three Consumer-Grade Motion Sensors During Overground and Treadmill Walking in People With Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. Lai B; Sasaki JE; Jeng B; Cederberg KL; Bamman MM; Motl RW JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Jan; 7(1):e14059. PubMed ID: 31944182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Treacy D; Hassett L; Schurr K; Chagpar S; Paul SS; Sherrington C Phys Ther; 2017 May; 97(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 28339904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. Kooiman TJ; Dontje ML; Sprenger SR; Krijnen WP; van der Schans CP; de Groot M BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2015; 7():24. PubMed ID: 26464801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between the activPAL accelerometer and direct observation during a series of gait and sit-to-stand tasks in people living with cervical dystonia. Yaqoob I; Gusso S; Simpson M; Meiring RM Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1286447. PubMed ID: 38725651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]