These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38386188)
1. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer]. Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revolutionizing sphincter preservation in ultra-low rectal cancer: exploring the potential of transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection (taE-ISR): a propensity score-matched cohort study. Xu X; Zhong H; You J; Ren M; Fingerhut A; Zheng M; Li J; Yang X; Song H; Zhang S; Ding C; Abuduaini N; Yu M; Liu J; Zhang Y; Kang L; Cai Z; Feng B Int J Surg; 2024 Feb; 110(2):709-720. PubMed ID: 38016136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers]. Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer. Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Li Z; Wang Q; Ning W; Yang Q; Huang Y; Yan S; Yang B; Xie M Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6852-6860. PubMed ID: 37308763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS; Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complete intersphincteric longitudinal muscle excision May Be key to reducing local recurrence during intersphincteric resection. Kim JC; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 33642088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection. Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transanal total mesorectal excision combined with intersphincteric resection has similar long-term oncological outcomes to laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Liu ZH; Zeng ZW; Jie HQ; Huang L; Luo SL; Liang WF; Zhang XW; Kang L Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2022; 10():goac026. PubMed ID: 35711716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Efficacy of Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. He Z; Peng B; Chen W; Zhu J; Chen B; Li G; Cao J; Li W Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1009-1017. PubMed ID: 34783266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reassessment of intersphincteric resection in the sphincter-preserving operation for ultra-low rectal cancer]. Zhang W Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 25(6):487-492. PubMed ID: 35754212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of robotic surgical system in sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer]. Xu P; Xu J Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 20(6):606-609. PubMed ID: 28643301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Shen Y; Yang T; Zeng H; Meng W; Deng X; Wei M; Wang Z Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 27(12):1307-1317. PubMed ID: 37804461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of anorectal dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic ultra-low resection and transanal intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Yu S; Deng J; Luo T; Zhen Z; Ji Y ANZ J Surg; 2020 Dec; 90(12):2478-2483. PubMed ID: 32564466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]