These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38386188)

  • 21. Study of anorectal dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic ultra-low resection and transanal intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
    Yu S; Deng J; Luo T; Zhen Z; Ji Y
    ANZ J Surg; 2020 Dec; 90(12):2478-2483. PubMed ID: 32564466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mesorectal fat area and mesorectal area affect the surgical difficulty of robotic-assisted mesorectal excision and intersphincteric resection respectively in different ways.
    Huang S; Chen M; Deng Y; Wang X; Lu X; Jiang W; Huang Y; Chi P
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Sep; 22(9):1130-1138. PubMed ID: 32040248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2623-2630. PubMed ID: 34008108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting.
    Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
    Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: the risk is functional rather than oncological. A 25-year experience from Bordeaux.
    Denost Q; Moreau JB; Vendrely V; Celerier B; Rullier A; Assenat V; Rullier E
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 32649005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.
    Sugoor P; Verma K; Chaturvedi A; Kannan S; Desouza A; Ostwal V; Engineer R; Saklani A
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1965. PubMed ID: 30318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
    Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
    Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases.
    Chau A; Frasson M; Debove C; Maggiori L; Panis Y
    Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 27631305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
    G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
    Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
    Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control analysis.
    Sun G; Zang Y; Ding H; Chen Y; Groothof D; Gong H; Lou Z; Meng R; Chen Z; Furnee E; Xiang J; Zhang W
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 27(12):1275-1287. PubMed ID: 37248369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis.
    Luca F; Valvo M; Guerra-Cogorno M; Simo D; Blesa-Sierra E; Biffi R; Garberoglio C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):841-7. PubMed ID: 27050311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Study of postoperative anorectal dynamics in ultra-low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection].
    Yu S; Deng J; Peng X; Wu Q; Lin Y; Zhu J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 19(8):928-32. PubMed ID: 27545470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Techniques and classification of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer].
    Zhang W; Zhu XM
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 26(6):557-561. PubMed ID: 37583009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?
    Klose J; Tarantino I; Kulu Y; Bruckner T; Trefz S; Schmidt T; Schneider M; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 May; 21(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 27981492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.