These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3838622)

  • 21. Otopathological findings in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Johnsson LG; House WF; Linthicum FH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):74-89. PubMed ID: 6805402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The cochlear implant.
    Gnau FB
    Kans Med; 1985 Apr; 86(4):118-9, 32. PubMed ID: 3838775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation in children and adults: a review of 342 cases in Vienna.
    Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 125(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 15966689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical or surgical complications related to the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Yurawecz J
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):574. PubMed ID: 2751219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Treatment of deafness with cochlear implants].
    Pedersen CB; Møller K; Jochumsen U; Spliid PE; Madsen S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Jul; 149(29):1931-3. PubMed ID: 3433410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear implants in chronic suppurative otitis media.
    Gray RF; Irving RM
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):682-6. PubMed ID: 8588677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The middle ear bioelectronic microphone for a totally implantable cochlear hearing device for profound and total hearing loss.
    Maniglia AJ; Abbass H; Azar T; Kane M; Amantia P; Garverick S; Ko WH; Frenz W; Falk T
    Am J Otol; 1999 Sep; 20(5):602-11. PubMed ID: 10503582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medical or surgical complications related to the Nucleus Multichannel Cochlear Implant.
    Cohen NL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Sep; 98(9):754. PubMed ID: 2782812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
    Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The expanding domain of implantable hearing devices: an update on current status in the United States.
    Spitzer JB; Fayad JN; Wazen JJ
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2003; 124(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12934441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Speech discrimination with bilateral cochlear implants in noisy conditions].
    Au KK; Jin H; Hui Y; Wei L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 12761958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The dispute concerning the benefits to be expected from cochlear implantation of young deaf children.
    Lane H
    Am J Otol; 1995 May; 16(3):393-9. PubMed ID: 8588637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses.
    McCreery DB
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):64-73. PubMed ID: 18207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bringing hearing to the profoundly deaf: a research report.
    Manning S; Meyerhoff WL
    Geriatrics; 1986 Mar; 41(3):78-80. PubMed ID: 3753949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reevaluation of results in tympanoplasty. A critical survey of 250 cases with particular regard to speech audiometry.
    PFALTZ CR; LUSCHER E; VOEGELI R; WEY W
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1962 May; 75():405-14. PubMed ID: 14486095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.