131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38387509)
1. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis.
Hung M; Ross AE; Li EV; Pavlovich CP; Fletcher SA; Gereta S; Zhang TR; McClure TD; Allaf ME; Schaeffer EM; Hu JC
Urology; 2024 Apr; 186():91-97. PubMed ID: 38387509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding systematic biopsy to magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in men with previous negative biopsy or enrolled in active surveillance programs: A prospective single center, randomized study.
Porreca A; Del Giudice F; Giampaoli M; D'Agostino D; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Del Rosso A; Maggi M; Chung BI; Ferro M; de Cobelli O; Lucarelli G; Schiavina R; De Berardinis E; Sciarra A; Busetto GM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(37):e22059. PubMed ID: 32925739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
