These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3838883)

  • 1. Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.
    Allen JK; Batjer JD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1985 Jun; 109(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 3838883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of leucocyte analysis on the Coulter STKS.
    Robertson EP; Lai HW; Wei DC
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1992; 14(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 1600694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Leukocyte differential of the Coulter VCS. Evaluation and modalities of use in comparison with the Coulter STKR and manual count].
    Jouault H; Imbert M; Mary JY; Ade P; Herpin J; Sultan C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 2360747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.
    Griswold DJ; Champagne VD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Jul; 84(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 4014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.
    Verheul FE; Spitters JM; Bergmans CH
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Mar; 31(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 8490065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Studies on the efficient application by STKS and 8200].
    Mishima S; Unshima T; Yoshida Y; Endo J
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jun; 40(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 1513029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of differential leukocyte counts by Coulter VCS cytometer and direct microscopic observation.
    Zaccaria A; Celso B; Raspadori D; Motta MR; Testoni N; Rizzi S
    Haematologica; 1990; 75(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 2097260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Further evolution and leukocyte differential using an automated blood cell counter].
    Takubo T; Tatsumi N
    Rinsho Byori; 1995 Sep; 43(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 7474456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the Coulter STKR differential histogram and the Coulter VCS formula analysis: a strategy of joint utilization].
    Garand R; Accard F
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 37(7):851-6. PubMed ID: 2631033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.
    Miers MK; Fogo AB; Federspiel CF; McAllister NW; Phillips PA; Cousar JB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1987 Jun; 87(6):745-51. PubMed ID: 3591747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
    Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of the Coulter MAXM. Differential leukocyte count and left-shift alarm].
    Vives Corrons JL; Jou JM; Aymerich M; Rozman M; Villamor N; Aguilar i Bascompte JL; Marín JL; Lloret M; Besson I
    Sangre (Barc); 1997 Feb; 42(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 9229801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymphocyte percentage and counts provided by Coulter Counter S+II: comparison with optical method and three automatical leukocyte analyzers (Hemalog D, H 6000, Diff 3).
    Forestier F; Amirault P; Carré C; Sassier P; Potron G; Guinebretière J; Therme JP
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1984; 26(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 6709496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
    Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated differential leukocyte counts.
    Morse EE; Nashed A; Spilove L
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1989; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 2658725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the new Coulter MAXM for leucocyte differentials.
    Picard F; Guesnu M; Levy JP; Flandrin G
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1992; 34(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 1448352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results.
    Qian Q; Tang YW; Kolbert CP; Torgerson CA; Hughes JG; Vetter EA; Harmsen WS; Montgomery SO; Cockerill FR; Persing DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3578-82. PubMed ID: 11574575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the monocyte channel of the Hemalog-D: correlation with visual microscopy.
    Aznar J; Vaya A; Osuna JJ; Monforte M
    Am J Med Technol; 1981 Nov; 47(11):923-31. PubMed ID: 7315862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An evaluation of automated hematology analyzers in detecting abnormal blood cells].
    Tanaka Y; Miyachi H; Kawada T; Ono H; Gondo K; Seki T; Ikeda M; Ando Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1991 Sep; 39(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 1942571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Avoiding regression analysis pitfalls when calibrating white blood cell differential counters.
    Westengard J; Bull BS
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 15479648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.