BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38389046)

  • 21. Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic restaging surgery for women with unexpected ovarian malignancy.
    Bae J; Choi JS; Lee WM; Koh AR; Jung US; Ko JH; Lee JH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():46-50. PubMed ID: 26232726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
    He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Early-stage Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bogani G; Borghi C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Lopez C; Sabatucci I; Scaffa C; Indini A; Ferrero S; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):552-562. PubMed ID: 28223182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
    Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers.
    Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Sonoda Y; Ivy J; Rhee E; Moore K; Levine DA; Barakat RR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1614-9. PubMed ID: 15902166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging for Ovarian Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Comparison With Traditional Open Surgery.
    Ditto A; Bogani G; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Indini A; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 27702704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in Systematic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Tanaka T; Terai Y; Hayashi S; Aoki D; Miki M; Kobayashi E; Kimura T; Baba T; Matsumura N; Ohmichi M
    J Gynecol Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(3):105-110. PubMed ID: 28611530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18437497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility and surgical outcomes of conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy for early-stage ovarian cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis.
    Bellia A; Vitale SG; Laganà AS; Cannone F; Houvenaeghel G; Rua S; Ladaique A; Jauffret C; Ettore G; Lambaudie E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27040423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective randomized trial comparing high lumbotomic with laparotomic access in renal cell carcinoma surgery.
    Battaglia M; Ditonno P; Martino P; Palazzo S; Annunziata G; Selvaggi FP
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(4):306-14. PubMed ID: 15669590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.
    Powless CA; Aletti GD; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Cliby WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 21636114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].
    He H; Yang Z; Zhang J; Yao D; Fan J; Zhao R; Zeng D; Hu X; Lin Z; Jiang Y; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):902-9. PubMed ID: 26887873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic staging for apparent early stage ovarian or fallopian tube cancer. First case series from a UK cancer centre and systematic literature review.
    Brockbank EC; Harry V; Kolomainen D; Mukhopadhyay D; Sohaib A; Bridges JE; Nobbenhuis MA; Shepherd JH; Ind TE; Barton DP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 39(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 23721765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].
    Li Z; Shi Y; Zhao Y; Qian F; Hao Y; Tang B; Luo H; Wan Y; Yu P
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 19(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 27215520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].
    Wu X; Sun LD; Wang M; Zhang P; Yang ZL; Liang H; Tao KX; Cao H; Xu WT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 23(9):888-895. PubMed ID: 32927514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive versus standard laparotomic interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm: A single-institution retrospective case-control study.
    Gueli Alletti S; Petrillo M; Vizzielli G; Bottoni C; Nardelli F; Costantini B; Quagliozzi L; Gallotta V; Scambia G; Fagotti A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Dec; 143(3):516-520. PubMed ID: 27769526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers.
    Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive adenomyomectomy via a laparoscopic-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic or laparotomic approach.
    Ahn JW; You SG; Go EB; Lee SH; Kim JS; Cho HJ; Roh HJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 34794729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.