155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38389113)
1. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.
Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) endovision system versus ultra-high-definition 4K endovision system in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a randomized-open label pilot study.
Parshad R; Nanjakla Jayappa S; Bhattacharjee HK; Suhani S; Joshi MK; Bhoi D; Kashyap L
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 33638108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial.
Thomaschewski M; Jürgens T; Keck T; Laubert T; Benecke C
Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 33530845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.
Zwimpfer TA; Wismer C; Fellmann-Fischer B; Geiger J; Schötzau A; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 34699034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application Value of 4K High-Definition System in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: Preliminary Results and Initial Experience.
Zhang L; Hong H; Zang L; Dong F; Lu A; Feng B; He Z; Xue P; Cai Z; Zheng M; Ma J
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Feb; 32(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 33970027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report.
Lu J; Zheng CH; Zheng HL; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2939-2945. PubMed ID: 27826781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial.
Dunstan M; Smith R; Schwab K; Scala A; Gatenby P; Whyte M; Rockall T; Jourdan I
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31321536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: A randomized control study.
Abdelrahman M; Belramman A; Salem R; Patel B
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():333-338. PubMed ID: 29656132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial.
Kanaji S; Watanabe R; Mascagni P; Trauzettel F; Urade T; Longo F; Guerriero L; Perretta S; Dallemagne B; Kakeji Y; Marescaux J
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5083-5091. PubMed ID: 31811456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.
Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 28986719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.
Wilhelm D; Reiser S; Kohn N; Witte M; Leiner U; Mühlbach L; Ruschin D; Reiner W; Feussner H
Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2387-97. PubMed ID: 24651895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems.
Kinoshita H; Nakagawa K; Usui Y; Iwamura M; Ito A; Miyajima A; Hoshi A; Arai Y; Baba S; Matsuda T
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2203-9. PubMed ID: 25361650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning Pattern of Two-Dimensional, Three-Dimensional, and Ultra-High-Definition Endovision System on Standardized Phantom Tasks: An
Bhattacharjee HK; Agarwal H; Singla V; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 34677083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of 3D vision on mental workload and laparoscopic performance in inexperienced subjects.
Gómez-Gómez E; Carrasco-Valiente J; Valero-Rosa J; Campos-Hernández JP; Anglada-Curado FJ; Carazo-Carazo JL; Font-Ugalde P; Requena-Tapia MJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 25457567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional laparoscopic gastric bypass for manual gastrojejunal anastomosis: A prospective and randomized trial.
Rojano-Rodríguez M; Torres-Ruíz M; Cuendis-Velazquez A; Romero-Loera LS; Reséndiz-Barragán M; Rentería-Palomo E; Vazquez-Cárdenas P; Moreno-Portillo M
Cir Cir; 2020; 88(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 32116321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
