187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38389833)
21. More focal, less heterogeneous? Multi-level meta-analysis of cathodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation effects on language and cognition.
Ostrowski J; Svaldi J; Schroeder PA
J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2022 Jul; 129(7):861-878. PubMed ID: 35585206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Villamar MF; Volz MS; Bikson M; Datta A; Dasilva AF; Fregni F
J Vis Exp; 2013 Jul; (77):e50309. PubMed ID: 23893039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Integrating electric field modeling and pre-tDCS behavioral performance to predict the individual tDCS effect on visual crowding.
Chen L; Chen G; Gong X; Fang F
J Neural Eng; 2023 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 37750681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study.
Kuo HI; Bikson M; Datta A; Minhas P; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 23149292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): A systematic review on the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Parlikar R; Vanteemar S S; Shivakumar V; Narayanaswamy C J; Rao P N; Ganesan V
Asian J Psychiatr; 2021 Feb; 56():102542. PubMed ID: 33486461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model.
Yoon MJ; Park HJ; Yoo YJ; Oh HM; Im S; Kim TW; Lim SH
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):2850. PubMed ID: 38310134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A computational study on effect of a transcranial channel as a skull/brain interface in the conventional rectangular patch-type transcranial direct current stimulation.
Hyeon Seo ; Hyoung-Ihl Kim ; Sung Chan Jun
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1946-1949. PubMed ID: 29060274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.
Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Alterations in learning-related cortical activation and functional connectivity by high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation after stroke: an fNIRS study.
Kim H; Lee G; Lee J; Kim YH
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1189420. PubMed ID: 37332855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the male mouse to promote recovery after stroke.
Pikhovych A; Walter HL; Mahabir E; Fink GR; Graf R; Schroeter M; Rueger MA
Lab Anim; 2016 Jun; 50(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 26442519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Task-Related Hemodynamic Changes Induced by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: An Uncontrolled Pilot fNIRS Study.
Kim H; Kim J; Lee G; Lee J; Kim YH
Brain Sci; 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35447985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Case Report: Initial Evidence of Safety and Efficacy of High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Patient With Neuropathic Pain and Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulator.
Deblieck C; Smeijers S; Morlion B; Datta A; Thomas C; Theys T
Front Pain Res (Lausanne); 2021; 2():753464. PubMed ID: 35295503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.
Molero-Chamizo A; Nitsche MA; Gutiérrez Lérida C; Salas Sánchez Á; Martín Riquel R; Andújar Barroso RT; Alameda Bailén JR; García Palomeque JC; Rivera-Urbina GN
Biology (Basel); 2021 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34943145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cortico-Muscular Coherence Modulated by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke.
Bao SC; Wong WW; Leung TWH; Tong KY
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Feb; 27(2):304-313. PubMed ID: 30596581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of Electrical Stimulation in Tinnitus Patients: Conventional Versus High-Definition tDCS.
Jacquemin L; Shekhawat GS; Van de Heyning P; Mertens G; Fransen E; Van Rompaey V; Topsakal V; Moyaert J; Beyers J; Gilles A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2018 Aug; 32(8):714-723. PubMed ID: 30019630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transcranial direct current stimulation: A review of electrode characteristics and materials.
Solomons CD; Shanmugasundaram V
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Nov; 85():63-74. PubMed ID: 33081965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of High-Definition and Conventional tDCS on Response Inhibition.
Hogeveen J; Grafman J; Aboseria M; David A; Bikson M; Hauner KK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):720-729. PubMed ID: 27198577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
