These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3839004)

  • 1. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 May; 77(5):1881-8. PubMed ID: 3839004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):998-1009. PubMed ID: 10462805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 8609291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing.
    Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3706-21. PubMed ID: 9193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.
    Lim HH; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):971-80. PubMed ID: 2794250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills.
    Tong YC; Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):951-62. PubMed ID: 3183213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Pijl S; Schwarz DW
    Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 8600127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    Audiology; 1996; 35(1):8-22. PubMed ID: 8790867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Franck KH; Xu L; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Mar; 4(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 12118364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding and decoding of auditory signals in relation to human speech and its application to human cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T; Fisch UP; Leifer LJ
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 6892766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM; Blamey PJ; Brown AM; Gusby PA; Dowell RC; Franz BK; Pyman BC; Shepherd RK; Tong YC; Webb RL
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S; Raine CH; Becconsall K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.