These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38390173)
1. Comparative life cycle assessment of light frame timber and reinforced concrete masonry structural systems for single-family houses in Luxembourg. Eslami H; Yaghma A; Jayasinghe LB; Waldmann D Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26083. PubMed ID: 38390173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study on Life-Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint of Hybrid, Concrete and Timber Apartment Buildings in Finland. Rinne R; Ilgın HE; Karjalainen M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35055595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in reinforced concrete and timber railway sleepers. Crawford RH Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May; 43(10):3885-90. PubMed ID: 19544903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mitigation of CO2 emissions from the EU-15 building stock: beyond the EU Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings. Petersdorff C; Boermans T; Harnisch J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Sep; 13(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 17067030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon footprint of low-energy buildings in the United Kingdom: Effects of mitigating technological pathways and decarbonization strategies. Norouzi M; Haddad AN; Jiménez L; Hoseinzadeh S; Boer D Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 882():163490. PubMed ID: 37068666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials. Balasbaneh AT; Sher W; Yeoh D; Yasin MN Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):26964-26981. PubMed ID: 36374387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seismic Performance of a Single-Story Timber-Framed Masonry Structure Strengthened with Fiber-Reinforced Cement Mortar. Tan W; Zhou T; Zhu L; Zhao X; Yu W; Zhang L; Liang Z Materials (Basel); 2024 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 39124308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biodiversity burdens in Spanish conventional and low-impact single-family homes. Izaola B; Akizu-Gardoki O Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 909():168371. PubMed ID: 37956848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Data and bills of materials for buildings designed for mass timber, structural steel, and reinforced concrete based on the 2021 international building code provisions. Kumar V; Ricco ML; Bergman RD; Nepal P; Poudyal NC Data Brief; 2024 Aug; 55():110641. PubMed ID: 39071965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced Carbon Reinforced Concrete Technologies for Façade Elements of Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings. Kraft R; Kahnt A; Grauer O; Thieme M; Wolz DS; Schlüter D; Tietze M; Curbach M; Holschemacher K; Jäger H; Böhm R Materials (Basel); 2022 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 35208159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health. Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia. Balasbaneh AT; Ramli MZ Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):43186-43201. PubMed ID: 32734541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Rouhi K; Shafiepour Motlagh M; Dalir F J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):890-901. PubMed ID: 37843987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Out-of-plane performance of structurally and energy retrofitted masonry walls: geopolymer versus cement-based textile-reinforced mortar combined with thermal insulation. Cholostiakow S; Skyrianou I; Koutas L; Papakonstantinou C Open Res Eur; 2023; 3():186. PubMed ID: 38357679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Net-Zero Embodied Carbon in Buildings with Today's Available Technologies. Watari T; Yamashita N; Serrenho AC Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Jan; 58(4):1793-1801. PubMed ID: 38228319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental Impact of Textile Reinforced Concrete Facades Compared to Conventional Solutions-LCA Case Study. Laiblová L; Pešta J; Kumar A; Hájek P; Fiala C; Vlach T; Kočí V Materials (Basel); 2019 Sep; 12(19):. PubMed ID: 31569478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential use of mass timber in mid-to high-rise construction and the associated carbon benefits in the United States. Nepal P; Prestemon JP; Ganguly I; Kumar V; Bergman RD; Poudyal NC PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0298379. PubMed ID: 38507362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GHG emissions and energy consumption of residential buildings-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fan Y; Fang C Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):885. PubMed ID: 37358677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Material Diets for Climate-Neutral Construction. Carcassi OB; Habert G; Malighetti LE; Pittau F Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Apr; 56(8):5213-5223. PubMed ID: 35377619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]