167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38390664)
1. Optimizing waterborne eDNA capture from waterholes in savanna systems under remote field conditions.
Schenekar T; Baxter J; Phukuntsi MA; Sedlmayr I; Weckworth B; Mwale M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13942. PubMed ID: 38390664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Species-level biodiversity assessment using marine environmental DNA metabarcoding requires protocol optimization and standardization.
Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Taylor HR; Lamare MD; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
Ecol Evol; 2019 Feb; 9(3):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 30805162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates by environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Zhang S; Zhao J; Yao M
J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117971. PubMed ID: 37119629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
Corral-Lou A; Doadrio I
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No filters, no fridges: a method for preservation of water samples for eDNA analysis.
Williams KE; Huyvaert KP; Piaggio AJ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jun; 9():298. PubMed ID: 27278936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
Hauck LL; Atkinson CL; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Mangum C; Coble AA; Nettles J; Thornton-Frost JE; Fix MJ
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding.
Matsuoka S; Sugiyama Y; Nagano M; Doi H
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13477. PubMed ID: 35651749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring.
Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.
Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Terrestrial mammal surveillance using hybridization capture of environmental DNA from African waterholes.
Seeber PA; McEwen GK; Löber U; Förster DW; East ML; Melzheimer J; Greenwood AD
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1486-1496. PubMed ID: 31349392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unveiling invasive insect threats to plant biodiversity: Leveraging eDNA metabarcoding and saturated salt trap solutions for biosurveillance.
Milián-García Y; Pyne C; Lindsay K; Romero A; Hanner RH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0290036. PubMed ID: 37566591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities.
Clark AJ; Atkinson SR; Scarponi V; Cane T; Geraldi NR; Hendy IW; Shipway JR; Peck M
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17091. PubMed ID: 38708339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals.
Allen MC; Kwait R; Vastano A; Kisurin A; Zoccolo I; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Maslo B; Lockwood JL
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):180. PubMed ID: 36604526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
