156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38392049)
1. Residents and Consultants Have Equal Outcomes When Performing Transrectal Fusion Biopsies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Turchi B; Lombardo R; Franco A; Tema G; Nacchia A; Cicione A; Pastore AL; Carbone A; Fuschi A; Franco G; Tubaro A; De Nunzio C
Curr Oncol; 2024 Jan; 31(2):747-758. PubMed ID: 38392049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Prospective Study Comparing Cancer Detection Rates of Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Performed by Junior Urologists versus a Senior Consultant in a Real-World Setting.
Song JA; He BM; Li HS; Yu XW; Shi ZK; Ren GY; Chen H; Gao X; Wang LH; Xu CL; Zeng SX; Wang HF
Urol Int; 2022; 106(9):884-890. PubMed ID: 34818262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Quentin M; Hiester A; Blondin D; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
World J Urol; 2016 Feb; 34(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 26055645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 30017964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prospective comparison of cognitive and mpMR/US fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection].
Petov VS; Bazarkin AK; Morozov AO; Taratkin MS; Ganzha TM; Danilov SP; Chernov YN; Chinenov DV; Amosov AV; Enikeev DV; Krupinov GE
Urologiia; 2022 Sep; (4):38-43. PubMed ID: 36098588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].
Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are concurrent systematic cores needed at the time of targeted biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies?
Albisinni S; Aoun F; Noel A; El Rassy E; Lemort M; Paesmans M; van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
Prog Urol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 29203158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies.
Eineluoto JT; Järvinen P; Kilpeläinen T; Lahdensuo K; Kalalahti I; Sandeman K; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):202-207. PubMed ID: 31102622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy using three-dimensional ultrasound-based organ-tracking technology: Initial experience in Japan.
Yamada Y; Fujihara A; Shiraishi T; Ueda T; Yamada T; Ueno A; Inoue Y; Kaneko M; Kamoi K; Hongo F; Okihara K; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2019 May; 26(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 30793385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate histoscanning true targeting guided prostate biopsy: initial clinical experience.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Macek P; Validire P; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1475-9. PubMed ID: 25501797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Saner YM; Wiesenfarth M; Weru V; Ladyzhensky B; Tschirdewahn S; Püllen L; Bonekamp D; Reis H; Krafft U; Heß J; Kesch C; Darr C; Forsting M; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Haubold J; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36175281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Endo J; Hashida K; Tomonaga T; Nakano M; Sugiyama T; Tajiri T; Terachi T; Uchida T
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25316213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
