158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38392049)
21. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complications and Adverse Events of Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Target Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Among Men with Prior Negative Biopsies: Results from the FUTURE Trial, a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kelder JC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):617-624. PubMed ID: 31519516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients.
Marra G; Zhuang J; Marquis A; Zhao X; Calleris G; Kan Y; Oderda M; Huang H; Faletti R; Zhang Q; Molinaro L; Wang W; Bergamasco L; Guo H; Gontero P
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1209-1215. PubMed ID: 32628099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer Using Target Saturation in Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography-fusion Biopsy.
Tschirdewahn S; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Püllen L; Reis H; Panic A; Kesch C; Darr C; Heß J; Giganti F; Moore CM; Guberina N; Forsting M; Wetter A; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1300-1307. PubMed ID: 32660838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy in daily practice: Results of a multicenter study of 2115 patients.
Oderda M; Marra G; Albisinni S; Altobelli E; Baco E; Beatrici V; Cantiani A; Carbone A; Ciccariello M; Descotes JL; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Eldred-Evans D; Fasolis G; Ferriero M; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Kumar P; Lacetera V; Mozer P; Muto G; Papalia R; Pastore A; Peltier A; Piechaud T; Simone G; Roche JB; Roupret M; Rouviere O; Van Velthoven R; Gontero P
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):990-997. PubMed ID: 30187529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Elwenspoek MMC; Sheppard AL; McInnes MDF; Merriel SWD; Rowe EWJ; Bryant RJ; Donovan JL; Whiting P
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198427. PubMed ID: 31390032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cognitive zonal fusion biopsy of the prostate: Original technique between target and saturation.
Galosi AB; Maselli G; Sbrollini G; Donatelli G; Montesi L; Tallè M; Montironi R
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Dec; 88(4):292-295. PubMed ID: 28073195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors.
Barrett T; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Wadhwa K; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 26238348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The learning curve of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: implications for training programs.
Benchikh El Fegoun A; El Atat R; Choudat L; El Helou E; Hermieu JF; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Ravery V
Urology; 2013 Jan; 81(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 23273070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.
Valerio M; Donaldson I; Emberton M; Ehdaie B; Hadaschik BA; Marks LS; Mozer P; Rastinehad AR; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 25454618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
