160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38392564)
1. Investigating Efficient Risk-Stratified Pathways for the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Morote J; Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban LM; Celma A; Campistol M; Miró B; Méndez O; Trilla E
J Pers Med; 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38392564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing the demand for magnetic resonance imaging scans and prostate biopsies during the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Applying the Barcelona risk-stratified pathway in Catalonia.
Morote J; Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban LE; Picola N; Muñoz-Rodriguez J; Paesano N; Ruiz-Plazas X; Muñoz-Rivero MV; Celma A; García-de Manuel G; Miró B; Abascal JM; Servian P
Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):115.e1-115.e7. PubMed ID: 38342654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Efficacy of Proclarix to Select Appropriate Candidates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Derived Prostate Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Morote J; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
World J Mens Health; 2022 Apr; 40(2):270-279. PubMed ID: 35021312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Morote J; Borque-Fernando Á; Triquell M; Campistol M; Servian P; Abascal JM; Planas J; Méndez O; Esteban LM; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jul; 53():46-54. PubMed ID: 37441350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Predictive Model Using Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category to Stratify Initial Prostate Cancer Suspicion and Reduce Magnetic Resonance Imaging Demand.
Morote J; Borque-Fernando Á; Triquell M; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; Abascal JM; Servian P; Planas J; Mendez O; Esteban LM; Trilla E
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36291883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.
Kelly BD; Ptasznik G; Roberts MJ; Doan P; Stricker P; Thompson J; Buteau J; Chen K; Alghazo O; O'Brien JS; Hofman MS; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Lundon D; Murphy DG; Emmett L; Moon D
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2023 Jul; 53():90-97. PubMed ID: 37441340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PROPOSe: A Real-life Prospective Study of Proclarix, a Novel Blood-based Test to Support Challenging Biopsy Decision-making in Prostate Cancer.
Steuber T; Heidegger I; Kafka M; Roeder MA; Chun F; Preisser F; Palisaar RJ; Hanske J; Budaeus L; Schiess R; Keller T; Semjonow A; Hammerer P; Manka L; Ecke T; Schwentner C; Ohlmann C
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 33422560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
Morote J; Campistol M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Int J Biol Markers; 2022 Jun; 37(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 35200058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prostate biopsy risk calculator based on MRI: development and comparison of the Prospective Loyola University multiparametric MRI (PLUM) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35733400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing prostate biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging with prostate cancer risk stratification.
Davik P; Remmers S; Elschot M; Roobol MJ; Bathen TF; Bertilsson H
BJUI Compass; 2022 Sep; 3(5):344-353. PubMed ID: 35950035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The current recommendation for the management of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
Morote J; Schwartzmann I; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):627-633. PubMed ID: 34375498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer by combining Proclarix with magnetic resonance imaging.
Morote J; Pye H; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; Semidey M; de Torres I; Mast R; Planas J; Santamaria A; Trilla E; Athanasiou A; Singh S; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Freeman A; Haider A; Schiess R; Whitaker HC; Punwani S; Ahmed HU; Emberton M
BJU Int; 2023 Aug; 132(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 36855895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Proclarix, PSA Density and MRI-ERSPC Risk Calculator to Select Patients for Prostate Biopsy after mpMRI.
Campistol M; Morote J; Triquell M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator for Predicting any Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Development of a Risk Predictive Tool and Validation with Advanced Neural Networking, Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database, and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.
Parekh S; Ratnani P; Falagario U; Lundon D; Kewlani D; Nasri J; Dovey Z; Stroumbakis D; Ranti D; Grauer R; Sobotka S; Pedraza A; Wagaskar V; Mistry L; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Martini A; Picker W; Haug E; Cormio L; Nordström T; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G; Haines K; Gorin MA; Wiklund P; Menon M; Tewari A
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jul; 41():45-54. PubMed ID: 35813258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Proclarix in the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer.
Kaufmann B; Fischer S; Athanasiou A; Lautenbach N; Wittig A; Bieri U; Schmid FA; von Stauffenberg F; Scherer T; Eberli D; Gorin MA; Schiess R; Poyet C
BJUI Compass; 2024 Mar; 5(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 38371198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance of Prostate Outperform Risk Calculators in Predicting Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Patients?
Falagario UG; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Di Nauta M; Auciello M; Sanguedolce F; Milillo P; Macarini L; Selvaggio O; Carrieri G; Cormio L
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():603384. PubMed ID: 33489907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
