These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38394423)

  • 1. Analysis of hematology quality control using six sigma metrics.
    Goel S; Nisal AR; Raj A; Nimbargi RC
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2024 Apr; 67(2):332-335. PubMed ID: 38394423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytical performance evaluation of a high-volume hematology laboratory utilizing sigma metrics as standard of excellence.
    Shaikh MS; Moiz B
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Apr; 38(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 26847366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Sigma metric approach for monitoring the performance of automated analyzers in hematology unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital.
    Ahmed El-Neanaey W; Mahmoud AbdEllatif N; Abdel Haleem Abo Elwafa R
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Dec; 43(6):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 34275191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sigma metric used to evaluate the performance of haematology analysers: choosing an internal reference analyser for the laboratory.
    Li M; Li X; Lu X; Zhong M; Wang L; Song M; Xue F
    Hematology; 2023 Dec; 28(1):2277498. PubMed ID: 37916652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeat patient testing-quality control with canine samples shows promise as an alternative to commercial quality control material for a network of four Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
    Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():39-47. PubMed ID: 37232498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of a six sigma model to evaluate the analytical performance of urinary biochemical analytes and design a risk-based statistical quality control strategy for these assays: A multicenter study.
    Liu Q; Bian G; Chen X; Han J; Chen Y; Wang M; Yang F
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Nov; 35(11):e24059. PubMed ID: 34652033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External quality assessment of automated hematology analyzer performance using fresh human blood samples in Shanghai.
    Xiaobo H; Yong L; Daming J; Lei X; Ying S; Jinfeng Z
    Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 14521326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sigma Metrics: A Valuable Tool for Evaluating the Performance of Internal Quality Control in Laboratory.
    Kashyap A; Sampath S; Tripathi P; Sen A
    J Lab Physicians; 2021 Dec; 13(4):328-331. PubMed ID: 34975251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indirect determination of hematology reference intervals in adult patients on Beckman Coulter UniCell DxH 800 and Abbott CELL-DYN Sapphire devices.
    Zierk J; Arzideh F; Haeckel R; Rauh M; Metzler M; Ganslandt T; Krause SW
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Apr; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 30367783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
    Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2022 Dec; 51(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 35922888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on the accuracy of automated hematology analyzers in Shanghai.
    Hu X; Li Y; Xu L; Wu J; Huang Y; Song Y; Jin D; Zhang J
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():1-5. PubMed ID: 12755259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond the basics: Sigma scores in laboratory medicine with variable total allowable errors (TEa).
    Yadav D; Rathore M; Banerjee M; Tomo S; Sharma P
    Clin Chim Acta; 2025 Jan; 565():119971. PubMed ID: 39326693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality control in a clinical chemistry laboratory.
    Kumar BV; Mohan T
    J Lab Physicians; 2018; 10(2):194-199. PubMed ID: 29692587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Sigma Metrics for Routine Chemistry Testing in 4 Laboratories in Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa.
    Moodley N; Gounden V
    J Appl Lab Med; 2022 May; 7(3):689-697. PubMed ID: 34636901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of biochemical analytes using six sigma metrics with two analyzers at an Indian lab setting.
    Gadde R; Hm V
    Bioinformation; 2023; 19(11):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 38046510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization and harmonization in hematology: Instrument alignment, quality control materials, and commutability issue.
    Vidali M; Carobene A; Apassiti Esposito S; Napolitano G; Caracciolo A; Seghezzi M; Previtali G; Lippi G; Buoro S
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Jun; 43(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 33174358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Analysis of internal quality control data of complete blood count from laboratories participating in national external quality assessment].
    Song ZZ; Li CB; Zhou WB; Gu XZ; Gu XL; Peng MT
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(24):1931-1936. PubMed ID: 29996285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Approach for Routinely Assessing Laboratory Sigma Metrics for a Broad Range of Automated Assays.
    Miller JJ; Gammie AJ
    J Appl Lab Med; 2024 May; 9(3):477-492. PubMed ID: 38391346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics.
    Park H; Ko Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2021 Sep; 41(5):447-454. PubMed ID: 33824232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Evaluation of the Quality Performance of Biochemical Analytes in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Using Six Sigma Matrices.
    Panda CR; Kumari S; Mangaraj M; Nayak S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e51386. PubMed ID: 38292960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.