125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38394613)
1. Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.
Choi CJ; Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2444-2460. PubMed ID: 38394613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A geometric calibration method for the digital chest tomosynthesis with dual-axis scanning geometry.
Chang CH; Ni YC; Huang SY; Hsieh HH; Tseng SP; Tseng FP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0216054. PubMed ID: 31022255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.
Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geometry calibration between X-ray source and detector for tomosynthesis with a portable X-ray system.
Sato K; Ohnishi T; Sekine M; Haneishi H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):707-717. PubMed ID: 28343304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.
Jacobson MW; Ketcha MD; Capostagno S; Martin A; Uneri A; Goerres J; De Silva T; Reaungamornrat S; Han R; Manbachi A; Stayman JW; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025030. PubMed ID: 29116058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Online geometry calibration for retrofit computed tomography from a mouse rotation system and a small-animal imager.
Zhou H; Reeves S; Chou CY; Brannen A; Panizzi P
Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 36039982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A generic geometric calibration method for tomographic imaging systems with flat-panel detectors--a detailed implementation guide.
Li X; Da Z; Liu B
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3844-54. PubMed ID: 20831092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Full 3-D modulation transfer function estimation of tomosynthesis system using modified Richardson-Lucy deconvolution.
Song H; Lee C; Baek J
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2510-2525. PubMed ID: 38011539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A nonconvex model-based combined geometric calibration scheme for micro cone-beam CT with irregular trajectories.
Li G; Chen X; You C; Huang X; Deng Z; Luo S
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2759-2774. PubMed ID: 36718546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric calibration of a mobile C-arm for intraoperative cone-beam CT.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Cho YB; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2124-36. PubMed ID: 18561688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.
Acciavatti RJ; Choi CJ; Vent TL; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2022; 12031():. PubMed ID: 37692411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-view geometric calibration for C-arm inverse geometry CT.
Slagowski JM; Dunkerley DAP; Hatt CR; Speidel MA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Jan; 4(1):013506. PubMed ID: 28560241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimizing magnetic resonance image geometric distortion at 7 Tesla for frameless presurgical planning using skin-adhered fiducials.
Kirby KM; Koons EK; Welker KM; Fagan AJ
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):694-701. PubMed ID: 36301228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.
Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
