These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38395615)

  • 1. Threat Expectation Does Not Improve Perceptual Discrimination despite Causing Heightened Priority Processing in the Frontoparietal Network.
    Haddara N; Rahnev D
    J Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 44(15):. PubMed ID: 38395615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threat expectation does not improve perceptual discrimination despite causing heightened priority processing in the frontoparietal network.
    Haddara N; Rahnev D
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37503060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prior Expectations of Motion Direction Modulate Early Sensory Processing.
    Aitken F; Turner G; Kok P
    J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 40(33):6389-6397. PubMed ID: 32641404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of imagery in threat-related perceptual decision making.
    Imbriano G; Sussman TJ; Jin J; Mohanty A
    Emotion; 2020 Dec; 20(8):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 31192666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinct Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Attention and Expectation Guide Perceptual Inference in a Multisensory World.
    Zuanazzi A; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 39(12):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 30659086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2017 Apr; 17(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 27819442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Notebaert L
    Emotion; 2008 Dec; 8(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 19102593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention to a threat-related feature does not interfere with concurrent attentive feature selection.
    Boylan MR; Kelly MN; Thigpen NN; Keil A
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jun; 56(6):e13332. PubMed ID: 30663061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable.
    Banerjee S; Grover S; Ganesh S; Sridharan D
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1538-1554. PubMed ID: 31268805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Here Comes Trouble: Prestimulus Brain Activity Predicts Enhanced Perception of Threat.
    Sussman TJ; Weinberg A; Szekely A; Hajcak G; Mohanty A
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Apr; 27(4):2695-2707. PubMed ID: 27114179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural bases of the interactions between spatial attention and conscious perception.
    Chica AB; Paz-Alonso PM; Valero-Cabré A; Bartolomeo P
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1269-79. PubMed ID: 22508767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is threat detection Black and White? Race effects in threat-related perceptual decision-making.
    Glasgow S; Imbriano G; Jin J; Mohanty A
    Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):616-626. PubMed ID: 32463276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus expectation alters decision criterion but not sensory signal in perceptual decision making.
    Bang JW; Rahnev D
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17072. PubMed ID: 29213117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altered attentional and perceptual processes as indexed by N170 during gaze perception in schizophrenia: Relationship with perceived threat and paranoid delusions.
    Tso IF; Calwas AM; Chun J; Mueller SA; Taylor SF; Deldin PJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2015 Aug; 124(3):519-531. PubMed ID: 25894438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Self-Referential Processing on Attentional Orienting in Frontoparietal Networks.
    Zhao S; Uono S; Li C; Yoshimura S; Toichi M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():199. PubMed ID: 29867422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Hemispheric Complementary Prefrontal Mechanisms during Task Switching under Perceptual Uncertainty.
    Tsumura K; Aoki R; Takeda M; Nakahara K; Jimura K
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(10):2197-2213. PubMed ID: 33468569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociable effects of attention and expectation on perceptual sensitivity to action-outcomes.
    George N; Mary Sunny M
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Aug; 103():103374. PubMed ID: 35872405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sympathetic responding to unconditioned stimuli predicts subsequent threat expectancy, orienting, and visuocortical bias in human aversive Pavlovian conditioning.
    Gruss LF; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():64-74. PubMed ID: 30476520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous and discrete representations of feature-based attentional priority in human frontoparietal network.
    Gong M; Liu T
    Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):47-59. PubMed ID: 30922203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.