These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38395930)
21. Relationship of established risk factors with breast cancer subtypes. McCarthy AM; Friebel-Klingner T; Ehsan S; He W; Welch M; Chen J; Kontos D; Domchek SM; Conant EF; Semine A; Hughes K; Bardia A; Lehman C; Armstrong K Cancer Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):6456-6467. PubMed ID: 34464510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hormone receptor and HER2 assessment in breast carcinoma metastatic to bone: A comparison between FNA cell blocks and decalcified core needle biopsies. Zeng J; Piscuoglio S; Aggarwal G; Magda J; Friedlander MA; Murray M; Akram M; Reis-Filho JS; Weigelt B; Edelweiss M Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 31883437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast Cancer Outcomes as Defined by the Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Growth Factor Receptor-2 in a Multi-ethnic Asian Country. Subramaniam S; Bhoo-Pathy N; Taib NA; Tan GH; See MH; Jamaris S; Ho GF; Looi LM; Yip CH World J Surg; 2015 Oct; 39(10):2450-8. PubMed ID: 26138872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial intelligence algorithm accurately assesses oestrogen receptor immunohistochemistry in metastatic breast cancer cytology specimens: A pilot study. Li BC; Hammond S; Parwani AV; Shen R Cytopathology; 2024 Jul; 35(4):464-472. PubMed ID: 38519745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Accurate Interpretation of HER2 Immunohistochemical Scores 0 and 1+ in Breast Cancer. Wu S; Yue M; Zhang J; Li X; Li Z; Zhang H; Wang X; Han X; Cai L; Shang J; Jia Z; Wang X; Li J; Liu Y Mod Pathol; 2023 Mar; 36(3):100054. PubMed ID: 36788100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantitative Image Analysis as an Adjunct to Manual Scoring of ER, PgR, and HER2 in Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Yousif M; Huang Y; Sciallis A; Kleer CG; Pang J; Smola B; Naik K; McClintock DS; Zhao L; Kunju LP; Balis UGJ; Pantanowitz L Am J Clin Pathol; 2022 Jun; 157(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 34875014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience. Kinsella MD; Nassar A; Siddiqui MT; Cohen C Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 22949935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Concordance between ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2-low expression in breast cancer by MammaTyper RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry: implications for the practising pathologist. Badr NM; Zaakouk M; Zhang Q; Kearns D; Kong A; Shaaban AM Histopathology; 2024 Sep; 85(3):437-450. PubMed ID: 38651302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in invasive breast cancer: a 3,198 cases study at National Cancer Center, China. Zhu X; Ying J; Wang F; Wang J; Yang H Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Oct; 147(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 25234844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases. Hoefnagel LD; van de Vijver MJ; van Slooten HJ; Wesseling P; Wesseling J; Westenend PJ; Bart J; Seldenrijk CA; Nagtegaal ID; Oudejans J; van der Valk P; van der Groep P; de Vries EG; van der Wall E; van Diest PJ Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(5):R75. PubMed ID: 20863372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic significance of estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors' status conversion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer: Results from a tertiary Cancer Center in Saudi Arabia. Al-Saleh K; Salah T; Arafah M; Husain S; Al-Rikabi A; Abd El-Aziz N PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247802. PubMed ID: 33667252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience. Slostad JA; Yun NK; Schad AE; Warrior S; Fogg LF; Rao R Cancer Med; 2022 Dec; 11(24):4954-4965. PubMed ID: 35733293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program. Francis GD; Dimech M; Giles L; Hopkins A J Clin Pathol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1277-83. PubMed ID: 17259294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer. Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Assess Hormonal Status From Tissue Microarrays in Patients With Breast Cancer. Shamai G; Binenbaum Y; Slossberg R; Duek I; Gil Z; Kimmel R JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197700. PubMed ID: 31348505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is there a role of breast pathologist in diagnostic challenges of discordances in ER, PR, and HER2 between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis? Altundag K J Neurooncol; 2018 May; 138(1):219. PubMed ID: 29383648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pattern of hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in sub-Saharan breast cancer cases: Private practice experience. Nwafor CC; Keshinro SO Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25966732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deep learned tissue "fingerprints" classify breast cancers by ER/PR/Her2 status from H&E images. Rawat RR; Ortega I; Roy P; Sha F; Shibata D; Ruderman D; Agus DB Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7275. PubMed ID: 32350370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases. Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Immunohistochemical assessment of HER2 low breast cancer: interobserver reproducibility and correlation with digital image analysis. Sun H; Kang EY; Chen H; Sweeney KJ; Suchko M; Wu Y; Wen J; Krishnamurthy S; Albarracin CT; Ding QQ; Foo WC; Sahin AA Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 38441847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]