177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38396020)
1. Biomechanical comparison of all-polyethylene total knee replacement and its metal-backed equivalent on periprosthetic tibia using the finite element method.
Apostolopoulos V; Boháč P; Marcián P; Nachtnebl L; Mahdal M; Pazourek L; Tomáš T
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Feb; 19(1):153. PubMed ID: 38396020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of all-polyethylene total knee arthroplasty on periprosthetic tibia using the finite element method.
Apostolopoulos V; Tomáš T; Boháč P; Marcián P; Mahdal M; Valoušek T; Janíček P; Nachtnebl L
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 220():106834. PubMed ID: 35490458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modular Metal-Backed Tibial Components Provide Minimal Mid-Term Survivorship Benefits Despite Increased Cost and Frequency of Use: A Retrospective Review of the American Joint Replacement Registry Database.
Kelley B; Mullen K; De A; Sassoon A
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1570-1574.e1. PubMed ID: 35189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes and survival comparison between NexGen all-poly and its metal-backed equivalent in total knee arthroplasty.
Apostolopoulos V; Nachtnebl L; Mahdal M; Pazourek L; Boháč P; Janíček P; Tomáš T
Int Orthop; 2023 Sep; 47(9):2207-2213. PubMed ID: 37069277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All-polyethylene tibial components in distal femur limb-salvage surgery: a finite element analysis based on promising clinical outcomes.
Tang F; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Min L; Shi R; Luo Y; Duan H; Tu C
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 12(1):57. PubMed ID: 28376828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.
Thompson SM; Yohuno D; Bradley WN; Crocombe AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2560-6. PubMed ID: 26694487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. All-polyethylene tibial components are not inferior to metal-backed tibial components in long-term follow-up of knee arthroplasties.
Yassin M; Garti A; Weissbrot M; Ashkenazi U; Khatib M; Robinson D
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Aug; 25(6):1087-91. PubMed ID: 26006786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components are equivalent with BMI of less than 37.5.
Toman J; Iorio R; Healy WL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 21997784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Meta-Analysis Comparing All-Polyethylene Tibial Component to Metal-Backed Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Assessing Survivorship and Functional Outcomes.
Voss B; El-Othmani MM; Schnur AK; Botchway A; Mihalko WM; Saleh KJ
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2628-2636. PubMed ID: 27538714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. All-Polyethylene versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
AbuMoussa S; White CC; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Knee Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(8):714-718. PubMed ID: 30959547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.
Brihault J; Navacchia A; Pianigiani S; Labey L; De Corte R; Pascale V; Innocenti B
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2550-9. PubMed ID: 25957612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Modern TKA.
Doran J; Yu S; Smith D; Iorio R
J Knee Surg; 2015 Oct; 28(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 26086937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: similar 2-year results of a randomized radiostereometric analysis study.
Hasan S; Marang-Van De Mheen PJ; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RGHH; Toksvig-Larsen S
Acta Orthop; 2019 Dec; 90(6):590-595. PubMed ID: 31550947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.
Apel DM; Tozzi JM; Dorr LD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):243-52. PubMed ID: 1959277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When Would a Metal-Backed Component Become Cost-Effective Over an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Browne JA; Dempsey IJ; Novicoff W; Wanchek T
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2018 Jun; 47(6):. PubMed ID: 29979808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Elmhiregh A; Abuodeh Y; Alzobi O; Zikria B; Alkhayarin M; Morrey BF
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 33(8):3611-3622. PubMed ID: 37249643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Infection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wyles CC; Watts CD; Cass JR; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1476-82. PubMed ID: 27067171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment on Knee Joint Biomechanics Following Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.
Nie Y; Yu Q; Shen B
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1423-1429. PubMed ID: 34018326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
Gudnason A; Hailer NP; W-Dahl A; Sundberg M; Robertsson O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 24951734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Economics of All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Prosthesis Designs.
Chambers MC; El-Othmani MM; Sayeed Z; Anoushiravani A; Schnur AK; Mihalko WM; Saleh KJ
Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3 Suppl):S61-6. PubMed ID: 27219732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
