142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38397430)
21. Multi-institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Fang AM; Shumaker LA; Martin KD; Jackson JC; Fan RE; Khajir G; Patel HD; Soodana-Prakash N; Vourganti S; Filson CP; Sonn GA; Sprenkle PC; Gupta GN; Punnen S; Rais-Bahrami S
Cancer; 2022 Sep; 128(18):3287-3296. PubMed ID: 35819253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Mistretta FA; Piccinelli ML; Lorusso V; Morelli M; Bianchi R; Catellani M; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Marvaso G; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):406-413. PubMed ID: 32989259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Which men with non-malignant pathology at magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy and persistent PI-RADS 3-5 lesions should repeat biopsy?
Castellani D; Pace G; Cecchini S; Franzese C; Cicconofri A; Romagnoli D; Del Rosso A; Possanzini M; Paci E; Dellabella M; Pierangeli T
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):452.e9-452.e16. PubMed ID: 35871992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.
Nguyen TA; Fourcade A; Zambon A; Saout K; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Tissot V; Doucet L; Rozet F; Fournier G; Valeri A
Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 41(8):354.e11-354.e18. PubMed ID: 37391283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of treatment with 5-α reductase inhibitors on progression in monitored men with favourable-risk prostate cancer.
Ross AE; Feng Z; Pierorazio PM; Landis P; Walsh PC; Carter HB; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 22289613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.
Barletta F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Brembilla G; de Angelis M; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Karnes RJ; Roupret M; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 36149448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can we omit systematic biopsies in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsies?
Leow JJ; Koh SH; Chow MW; Loke W; Salada R; Hong SK; Yeow Y; Lee CH; Tan CH; Tan TW
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 35488666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
