142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38397430)
41. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prostate biopsy in the era of MRI-targeting: towards a judicious use of additional systematic biopsy.
Deniffel D; Perlis N; Ghai S; Girgis S; Healy GM; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7544-7554. PubMed ID: 35507051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The use of
Yang J; Tang Y; Zhou C; Zhou M; Li J; Hu S
Prostate; 2023 Apr; 83(5):430-439. PubMed ID: 36544382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Alkema NG; Hoogeveen SFJS; Cauberg ECC; Witte LPW; van 't Veer-Ten Kate M; de Boer E; Hoogland MAM; Blanker MH; Boomsma MF; Steffens MG
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 44():125-130. PubMed ID: 36185584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A prostate biopsy risk calculator based on MRI: development and comparison of the Prospective Loyola University multiparametric MRI (PLUM) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35733400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Combined Utility of
Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Ryan A; Konety B; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 33741337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. African American Men have Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer Detection Despite Similar Rates of Anterior Prostatic Lesions and PI-RADS Grade on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Patel HD; Doshi CP; Koehne EL; Hart S; Van Kuiken M; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Gupta GN
Urology; 2022 May; 163():132-137. PubMed ID: 34302832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Porpiglia F; Manfredi M; Mele F; Cossu M; Bollito E; Veltri A; Cirillo S; Regge D; Faletti R; Passera R; Fiori C; De Luca S
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):282-288. PubMed ID: 27574821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.
Wei X; Xu J; Zhong S; Zou J; Cheng Z; Ding Z; Zhou X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3574-3582. PubMed ID: 35788882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative prostate biopsy: The current value of microscopic findings.
Morote J; Schwartzman I; Borque A; Esteban LM; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semidey ME; Regis L; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):432.e11-432.e19. PubMed ID: 33160846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database.
Emmett L; Papa N; Counter W; Calais J; Barbato F; Burger I; Eiber M; Roberts MJ; Agrawal S; Franklin A; Xue A; Rasiah K; John N; Moon D; Frydenberg M; Yaxley J; Stricker P; Wong K; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Hsiao E; Sutherland T; Perry E; Fendler WP; Hope TA
J Nucl Med; 2024 Jan; 65(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 38050155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. bpMRI and mpMRI for detecting prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Pan Y; Shen C; Chen X; Cao D; Jiang J; Xu W; Ji C; Pan X; Zheng B
Front Surg; 2022; 9():1096387. PubMed ID: 36726941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and follow-up to avoid prostate biopsy in 4259 men.
Venderink W; van Luijtelaar A; van der Leest M; Barentsz JO; Jenniskens SFM; Sedelaar MJP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Overduin CG; Fütterer JJ
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124(5):775-784. PubMed ID: 31237388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
