196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38398152)
1. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Versus Aspiration for Tissue Sampling Adequacy for Molecular Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Mohamed WT; Jahagirdar V; Jaber F; Ahmed MK; Fatima I; Bierman T; Fu Z; Jones PG; Hassan AF; Faber E; Clarkston WK; Ghoz H; Tawfik OW; Jonnalagadda S
Cancers (Basel); 2024 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38398152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An exclusive fine-needle biopsy approach to sampling solid lesions under EUS guidance: a prospective cohort study.
Temnykh LM; Rahal MA; Zia Z; Al-Haddad MA
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2020 Oct; 8(5):349-354. PubMed ID: 33163189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy.
Aadam AA; Wani S; Amick A; Shah JN; Bhat YM; Hamerski CM; Klapman JB; Muthusamy VR; Watson RR; Rademaker AW; Keswani RN; Keefer L; Das A; Komanduri S
Endosc Int Open; 2016 May; 4(5):E497-505. PubMed ID: 27227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Takagi T; Sugimoto M; Imamura H; Takahata Y; Nakajima Y; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Irie H; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Hashimoto Y; Shibukawa G; Marubashi S; Hikichi T; Ohira H
Clin Endosc; 2023 Jan; 56(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 36646425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions: Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison.
Gheorghiu M; Seicean A; Bolboacă SD; Rusu I; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Moșteanu O; Sparchez Z
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
