These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38398357)

  • 1. Cephalic Vein Cutdown Is Superior to Subclavian Puncture as Venous Access for Patients with Cardiac Implantable Devices after Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Knorr D; Bandorski D; Bogossian H; Iliodromitis K; Schiedat F; Karosiene Z; Mijic D; Lemke B; Seyfarth M; Voß S; Knippschild S; Aweimer A; Zarse M; Kloppe A; Botsios S
    J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38398357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subclavian and Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Atti V; Turagam MK; Garg J; Koerber S; Angirekula A; Gopinathannair R; Natale A; Lakkireddy D
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 6(6):661-671. PubMed ID: 32553216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial.
    Charles P; Ditac G; Montoy M; Thenard T; Courand PY; Lantelme P; Harbaoui B; Fareh S
    Eur Heart J; 2023 Dec; 44(46):4847-4858. PubMed ID: 37832512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Puncture by Modified Seldinger Technique Compared to Subclavian Vein Puncture for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
    Weidauer MC; Knüpfer E; Lottermoser J; Alkomi U; Schoen S; Wunderlich C; Christoph M; Francke A
    Clin Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 47(8):e24327. PubMed ID: 39077849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Axillary vein puncture versus cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A meta-analysis.
    Vetta G; Magnocavallo M; Parlavecchio A; Caminiti R; Polselli M; Sorgente A; Cauti FM; Crea P; Pannone L; Marcon L; Savio AL; Pistelli L; Vetta F; Chierchia GB; Rossi P; Bianchi S; Natale A; de Asmundis C; Rocca DGD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 46(8):942-947. PubMed ID: 37378419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vasoconstrictive responses of the cephalic vein during first-time cardiac implantable electronic device placement.
    Steckiewicz R; Świętoń EB; Bogdańska M; Stolarz P
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2018; 77(3):464-470. PubMed ID: 29345717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.
    Chan NY; Kwong NP; Cheong AP
    Europace; 2017 Jul; 19(7):1193-1197. PubMed ID: 27733455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative complications after pacemaker implantation: higher complication rates with subclavian vein puncture than with cephalic vein cutdown.
    Hasan F; Nedios S; Karosiene Z; Scholten M; Lemke B; Tulka S; Knippschild S; Macher-Heidrich S; Adomeit HJ; Zarse M; Bogossian H
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Jun; 66(4):857-863. PubMed ID: 35107720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different venous approaches for implantation of cardiac electronic devices. A network meta-analysis.
    Anagnostopoulos I; Kossyvakis C; Kousta M; Verikokkou C; Lakka E; Karakanas A; Deftereos G; Spanou P; Giotaki S; Vrachatis D; Avramidis D; Deftereos S; Giannopoulos G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jun; 45(6):717-725. PubMed ID: 35554947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalic vs. subclavian lead implantation in cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Benz AP; Vamos M; Erath JW; Hohnloser SH
    Europace; 2019 Jan; 21(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 30020452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation.
    Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):469-73. PubMed ID: 11341084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalic Vein Cut Down for Total Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Retrospective Review of a Single Institution Series.
    Vélez ÁB
    EJVES Vasc Forum; 2023; 59():2-7. PubMed ID: 37213486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implications of cephalic vein morphometry in routine cardiac implantable electronic device insertion.
    Steckiewicz R; Świętoń E; Stolarz P; Grabowski M
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2015; 74(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 26620505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unusual Venous Access for Device Implantation.
    Al-Sadawi M; Budzikowski AS
    Am J Case Rep; 2019 Oct; 20():1482-1486. PubMed ID: 31591374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Access for starting kidney replacement therapy: vascular and peritoneal temporal access in pre-dialysis].
    Rodríguez CR; Bardón Otero E; Vila Paz ML
    Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 3():105-12. PubMed ID: 19018747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Axillary vein spasm during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.
    Steckiewicz R; Górko D; Świętoń EB; Szparecki G; Stolarz P
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2016; 75(4):543-549. PubMed ID: 27830883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to perform extrathoracic venous access for cardiac implantable electronic device placement: Detailed description of techniques.
    Su J; Kusumoto FM; Zhou X; Elayi CS
    Heart Rhythm; 2022 Jul; 19(7):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 35231611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of central venous occlusion in patients with chronic defibrillator leads.
    Sticherling C; Chough SP; Baker RL; Wasmer K; Oral H; Tada H; Horwood L; Kim MH; Pelosi F; Michaud GF; Strickberger SA; Morady F; Knight BP
    Am Heart J; 2001 May; 141(5):813-6. PubMed ID: 11320371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
    Povoski SP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
    Orci LA; Meier RP; Morel P; Staszewicz W; Toso C
    Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.