These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38398478)

  • 1. Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock.
    Padberg JS; Feld J; Padberg L; Köppe J; Makowski L; Gerß J; Dröge P; Ruhnke T; Günster C; Lange SA; Reinecke H
    J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38398478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impact of VA-ECMO combined with IABP and timing on outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock].
    Pan CL; Zhao J; Hu SX; Lei P; Zhao CR; Su YR; Cai WT; Zhang SS; Yan ZJ; Lu AD; Zhang B; Bai M
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 51(8):851-858. PubMed ID: 37583334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.
    Char S; Fried J; Melehy A; Mehta S; Ning Y; Kurlansky P; Takeda K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 165(2):699-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34243933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Trends for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock From Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure: Incidence, Predictors, Outcomes, and Cost.
    Malik A; Basu T; VanAken G; Aggarwal V; Lee R; Abdul-Aziz A; Birati EY; Basir MB; Nallamothu BK; Shore S
    J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv; 2023; 2(6Part B):101177. PubMed ID: 39131060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Concomitant Use of Impella vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump　- A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Japanese Claims-Based Database.
    Nitta M; Nakano S; Kaneko M; Fushimi K; Hibi K; Shimizu S
    Circ J; 2024 Jul; 88(8):1276-1285. PubMed ID: 38220207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study.
    Yeo I; Axman R; Lu DY; Feldman DN; Cheung JW; Minutello RM; Karas MG; Iannacone EM; Srivastava A; Girardi NI; Naka Y; Wong SC; Kim LK
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Feb; 13(3):e032607. PubMed ID: 38240236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock.
    Shibasaki I; Masawa T; Abe S; Ogawa H; Takei Y; Tezuka M; Seki M; Kato T; Watanabe R; Koshiji N; Saitou S; Ogata K; Haruyama Y; Toyoda S; Fukuda H
    J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 80(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 35288000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of intra-aortic balloon pump with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A meta-analysis.
    Liu Y; Zeng M; Zhou Y; Qiu W; Zeng R; Zhou Y
    Perfusion; 2024 Oct; 39(7):1323-1334. PubMed ID: 37498618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock due to ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of the National Readmissions Database.
    Briasoulis A; Kampaktsis P; Emfietzoglou M; Kuno T; Van den Eynde J; Ntalianis A; Duque ER; Malik AH
    Angiology; 2023 Jan; 74(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 35440216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus concomitant intra-aortic-balloon-pump for cardiogenic shock.
    Au SY; Fong KM; Tsang CS; Chan KA; Wong CY; Ng WG; Lee KYM
    Perfusion; 2023 Jan; 38(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 34318736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella Versus IABP in Patients With VA-ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Gandhi KD; Moras EC; Niroula S; Lopez PD; Aggarwal D; Bhatia K; Balboul Y; Daibes J; Correa A; Dominguez AC; Birati EY; Baran DA; Serrao G; Mahmood K; Vallabhajosyula S; Fox A
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 208():53-59. PubMed ID: 37812867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Plus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Nishi T; Ishii M; Tsujita K; Okamoto H; Koto S; Nakai M; Sumita Y; Iwanaga Y; Matoba S; Kobayashi Y; Hirata KI; Hikichi Y; Yokoi H; Ikari Y; Uemura S
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Apr; 11(7):e023713. PubMed ID: 35377180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Kim Y; Shapero K; Ahn SS; Goldsweig AM; Desai N; Altin SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):658-663. PubMed ID: 34156755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes with temporary mechanical circulatory support before minimally invasive centrifugal left ventricular assist device.
    Sorensen EN; Griffith BP; Feller ED; Kaczorowski DJ
    J Card Surg; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 32579786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of mechanical circulatory support-related complications in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Takahashi K; Kubo S; Ikuta A; Osakada K; Takamatsu M; Taguchi Y; Ohya M; Shimada T; Miura K; Tada T; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Kadota K
    J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 79(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 34511239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Healthcare Resource Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Impella Versus Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights From National Inpatient Sample.
    Dodoo SN; Kwapong YA; Agyemang-Sarpong A; Amoran E; Egolum UO; Ghasemzadeh N; Ramadan R; Henry G; Samady H
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 49(1 Pt A):102053. PubMed ID: 37640173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy Receiving Acute Mechanical Support in the US.
    Jang SJ; Malaguez Webber F; Alam MM; Bae JY; Aggarwal A; Thomas A; Zarich SW; Ahmad T; Miller PE; Davila CD
    J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv; 2023; 2(6Part B):101185. PubMed ID: 39131072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Alushi B; Douedari A; Froehlig G; Knie W; Wurster TH; Leistner DM; Stahli BE; Mochmann HC; Pieske B; Landmesser U; Krackhardt F; Skurk C
    Open Heart; 2019; 6(1):e000987. PubMed ID: 31218000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.