These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38398581)

  • 1. Machine Learning Methods as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Physics-Based Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Bansal N; Wang Y; Sciabola S
    Molecules; 2024 Feb; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 38398581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computationally predicting binding affinity in protein-ligand complexes: free energy-based simulations and machine learning-based scoring functions.
    Wang DD; Zhu M; Yan H
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32591817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a machine-learning model to predict Gibbs free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Biophys Chem; 2018 Sep; 240():63-69. PubMed ID: 29906639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can molecular dynamics simulations improve predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity with machine learning?
    Gu S; Shen C; Yu J; Zhao H; Liu H; Liu L; Sheng R; Xu L; Wang Z; Hou T; Kang Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36681903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classical and Machine Learning Methods for Protein - Ligand Binding Free Energy Estimation.
    Sivakumar D; Wu S
    Curr Drug Metab; 2022; 23(4):252-259. PubMed ID: 35293293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing Hit Discovery in Virtual Screening through Absolute Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations.
    Chen W; Cui D; Jerome SV; Michino M; Lenselink EB; Huggins DJ; Beautrait A; Vendome J; Abel R; Friesner RA; Wang L
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):3171-3185. PubMed ID: 37167486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using diverse potentials and scoring functions for the development of improved machine-learned models for protein-ligand affinity and docking pose prediction.
    Demerdash ONA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1095-1123. PubMed ID: 34708263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Template-Based Method for Conformation Generation and Scoring for Congeneric Series of Ligands.
    Raman EP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2690-2701. PubMed ID: 31045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from a Consecutive Histograms Monte Carlo Sampling Method.
    Liu H; Deng J; Luo Z; Lin Y; Merz KM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Oct; 16(10):6645-6655. PubMed ID: 32857938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synergy and Complementarity between Focused Machine Learning and Physics-Based Simulation in Affinity Prediction.
    Cleves AE; Johnson SR; Jain AN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):5948-5966. PubMed ID: 34890185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large-Scale Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations in Active Drug Discovery Projects.
    Schindler CEM; Baumann H; Blum A; Böse D; Buchstaller HP; Burgdorf L; Cappel D; Chekler E; Czodrowski P; Dorsch D; Eguida MKI; Follows B; Fuchß T; Grädler U; Gunera J; Johnson T; Jorand Lebrun C; Karra S; Klein M; Knehans T; Koetzner L; Krier M; Leiendecker M; Leuthner B; Li L; Mochalkin I; Musil D; Neagu C; Rippmann F; Schiemann K; Schulz R; Steinbrecher T; Tanzer EM; Unzue Lopez A; Viacava Follis A; Wegener A; Kuhn D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5457-5474. PubMed ID: 32813975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative surface field analysis: learning causal models to predict ligand binding affinity and pose.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jul; 32(7):731-757. PubMed ID: 29934750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.