These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38399552)

  • 1. Comparison of Fusion Rates among Various Demineralized Bone Matrices in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lee S; Ham DW; Kwon O; Park JH; Yoon Y; Kim HJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery].
    Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Peng C; Zhu J; Zhang P
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 34(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 32538569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Study of Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Demineralized Bone Matrix Alone or with Low-Dose Escherichia coli-Derived rhBMP-2.
    Roh YH; Lee JC; Cho HK; Jang HD; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e557-e565. PubMed ID: 34775087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Application of ultrasonic osteotome in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery by unilateral fenestration and bilateral decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Liao Y; Ye R; Tang Q; Tang C; Ma F; Luo N; Wang G; Wang Q; Zhong D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 30983187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Chen M; Cui J; Liu Y; Cai Z; Yang C; Liu H; Chen Y; Yao Z
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 38287376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.
    Liu Z; Wang S; Li T; Chen S; Li Y; Xie W; Tang J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):70. PubMed ID: 38225673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction in adjacent-segment degeneration after multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion with proximal DIAM implantation.
    Lu K; Liliang PC; Wang HK; Liang CL; Chen JS; Chen TB; Wang KW; Chen HJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25932598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterolateral versus posterior minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis: comparison of outcomes from a global, multicenter study at 12-months follow-up.
    Pereira P; Park Y; Arzoglou V; Charles YP; Krutko A; Senker W; Park SW; Franke J; Fuentes S; Bordon G; Song Y; He S; Vialle E; Mlyavykh S; Varanda P; Hosszu T; Bhagat S; Hong JY; Vanhauwaert D; de la Dehesa P
    Spine J; 2023 Oct; 23(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 37236367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study.
    Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Cai Y; Yang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12680. PubMed ID: 30290656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic stabilization using the Dynesys system versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a clinical and radiological outcomes-based meta-analysis.
    Lee CH; Jahng TA; Hyun SJ; Kim CH; Park SB; Kim KJ; Chung CK; Kim HJ; Lee SE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E7. PubMed ID: 26721581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a comparative study of clinical efficacy and adjacent segment degeneration.
    Li D; Hai Y; Meng X; Yang J; Yin P
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 31253158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
    Liu G; Liu W; Jin D; Yan P; Yang Z; Liu R
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):271-280. PubMed ID: 36252809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Arnold PM; Robbins S; Paullus W; Faust S; Holt R; McGuire R
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Jul; 38(7):E115-22. PubMed ID: 19714280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.
    Sakaura H; Miwa T; Yamashita T; Kuroda Y; Ohwada T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):591-595. PubMed ID: 27231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up.
    Park MK; Park SA; Son SK; Park WW; Choi SH
    Neurosurg Rev; 2019 Sep; 42(3):753-761. PubMed ID: 31144195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effectiveness analysis of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope for L
    Liu C; Huang W; Li J; Geng X; Dou Y; Cao S; Hou D; Zhu T; Sun Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 37(8):989-995. PubMed ID: 37586800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Fusion Rate and Functional Outcome Between Local Cancellous Bone Plus Demineralized Bone Matrix and Local Bone in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Ko S; Jun C; Nam J
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Aug; 35(7):E621-E626. PubMed ID: 35354780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases.
    He LM; Chen KT; Chen CM; Chang Q; Sun L; Zhang YN; Chang JJ; Feng HY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):329. PubMed ID: 35392878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.