166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38400412)
1. Obesity-Specific Considerations for Assessing Gait with Inertial Measurement Unit-Based vs. Optokinetic Motion Capture.
Rekant J; Rothenberger S; Chambers A
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 38400412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inertial measurement unit-based motion capture to replace camera-based systems for assessing gait in healthy young adults: Proceed with caution.
Rekant J; Rothenberger S; Chambers A
Measur Sens; 2022 Oct; 23():. PubMed ID: 36506853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematics and temporospatial parameters during gait from inertial motion capture in adults with and without HIV: a validity and reliability study.
Berner K; Cockcroft J; Louw Q
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Jul; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 32709239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sagittal plane knee kinematics can be measured during activities of daily living following total knee arthroplasty with two IMU.
Cornish BM; Diamond LE; Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG; Shi B; Lyon J; Abbruzzese K; Gallie P; Maharaj J
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0297899. PubMed ID: 38359050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-Derived 3D Joint Kinematics in Persons Wearing Transtibial Prosthesis.
Rattanakoch J; Samala M; Limroongreungrat W; Guerra G; Tharawadeepimuk K; Nanbancha A; Niamsang W; Kerdsomnuek P; Suwanmana S
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent validity and within-session reliability of gait kinematics measured using an inertial motion capture system with repeated calibration.
Berner K; Cockcroft J; Morris LD; Louw Q
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Oct; 24(4):251-260. PubMed ID: 33218520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body-Worn IMU-Based Human Hip and Knee Kinematics Estimation during Treadmill Walking.
McGrath T; Stirling L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor Single Axis Rotation Angles for Knee and Hip Flexion Angle Calculations During Gait.
Oliveira N; Park J; Barrance P
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2023; 11():80-86. PubMed ID: 36704243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of wearable inertial sensor-based gait analysis system for measurement of spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity joint kinematics in sagittal plane.
Patel G; Mullerpatan R; Agarwal B; Shetty T; Ojha R; Shaikh-Mohammed J; Sujatha S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 May; 236(5):686-696. PubMed ID: 35001713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inertial motion capture validation of 3D knee kinematics at various gait speed on the treadmill with a double-pose calibration.
Robert-Lachaine X; Parent G; Fuentes A; Hagemeister N; Aissaoui R
Gait Posture; 2020 Mar; 77():132-137. PubMed ID: 32035296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Non-Restrictive Inertial Gait Analysis of Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Clinical Settings.
Haji Hassani R; Willi R; Rauter G; Bolliger M; Seel T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time conversion of inertial measurement unit data to ankle joint angles using deep neural networks.
Senanayake D; Halgamuge S; Ackland DC
J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110552. PubMed ID: 34237661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy Verification of Spatio-Temporal and Kinematic Parameters for Gait Using Inertial Measurement Unit System.
Yeo SS; Park GY
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 32121456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults.
Agostini V; Gastaldi L; Rosso V; Knaflitz M; Tadano S
Sensors (Basel); 2017 Oct; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 29065485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy validation of a wearable IMU-based gait analysis in healthy female.
He Y; Chen Y; Tang L; Chen J; Tang J; Yang X; Su S; Zhao C; Xiao N
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2024 Jan; 16(1):2. PubMed ID: 38167148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inertial measurement unit compared to an optical motion capturing system in post-stroke individuals with foot-drop syndrome.
Feuvrier F; Sijobert B; Azevedo C; Griffiths K; Alonso S; Dupeyron A; Laffont I; Froger J
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 May; 63(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 31009801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower Extremity Inverse Kinematics Results Differ Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Marker-Derived Gait Data.
Hafer JF; Mihy JA; Hunt A; Zernicke RF; Johnson RT
J Appl Biomech; 2023 Jun; 39(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 37024103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. IMUs Can Estimate Hip and Knee Range of Motion during Walking Tasks but Are Not Sensitive to Changes in Load or Grade.
Fain A; McCarthy A; Nindl BC; Fuller JT; Wills JA; Doyle TLA
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the reliability of single-camera markerless systems for overground gait monitoring.
Boldo M; Di Marco R; Martini E; Nardon M; Bertucco M; Bombieri N
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108101. PubMed ID: 38340440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using inertial measurement units to estimate spine joint kinematics and kinetics during walking and running.
Sibson BE; Banks JJ; Yawar A; Yegian AK; Anderson DE; Lieberman DE
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):234. PubMed ID: 38168540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
