161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38400653)
1. Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Dashti SG; Lee KJ; Simpson JA; White IR; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M
Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38400653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recoverability and estimation of causal effects under typical multivariable missingness mechanisms.
Zhang J; Dashti SG; Carlin JB; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M
Biom J; 2024 Apr; 66(3):e2200326. PubMed ID: 38637322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
Schuler MS; Rose S
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the use of multiple imputation to address data missing by design as well as unintended missing data in case-cohort studies with a binary endpoint.
Middleton M; Nguyen C; Carlin JB; Moreno-Betancur M; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):287. PubMed ID: 38062377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should multiple imputation be stratified by exposure group when estimating causal effects via outcome regression in observational studies?
Zhang J; Dashti SG; Carlin JB; Lee KJ; Moreno-Betancur M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):42. PubMed ID: 36797679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
Sperrin M; Martin GP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imputation of missing covariate in randomized controlled trials with a continuous outcome: Scoping review and new results.
Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):840-860. PubMed ID: 32510791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approaches for missing covariate data in logistic regression with MNAR sensitivity analyses.
Ward RC; Axon RN; Gebregziabher M
Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1025-1037. PubMed ID: 31957905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imputation of Missing Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials with Continuous Outcomes: Simple, Unbiased and Efficient Methods.
Kayembe MT; Jolani S; Tan FES; van Breukelen GJP
J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 32(5):717-739. PubMed ID: 35041565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Missing continuous outcomes under covariate dependent missingness in cluster randomised trials.
Hossain A; Diaz-Ordaz K; Bartlett JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1543-1562. PubMed ID: 27177885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Missing data strategies for time-varying confounders in comparative effectiveness studies of non-missing time-varying exposures and right-censored outcomes.
Desai M; Montez-Rath ME; Kapphahn K; Joyce VR; Mathur MB; Garcia A; Purington N; Owens DK
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3204-3220. PubMed ID: 31099433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review.
Mainzer R; Moreno-Betancur M; Nguyen C; Simpson J; Carlin J; Lee K
BMJ Open; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e065576. PubMed ID: 36725096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
