These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli. Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The attentional-relevance and temporal dynamics of visual-tactile crossmodal interactions differentially influence early stages of somatosensory processing. Popovich C; Staines WR Brain Behav; 2014 Mar; 4(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 24683517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Event-related potential evidence for the use of external coordinates in the preparation of tactile attention by the early blind. Eardley AF; van Velzen J Eur J Neurosci; 2011 May; 33(10):1897-907. PubMed ID: 21545656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The N2cc component as an electrophysiological marker of space-based and feature-based attentional target selection processes in touch. Katus T; Eimer M Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13391. PubMed ID: 31066917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory. Katus T; Müller MM; Eimer M J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1390-5. PubMed ID: 25632117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Independent effects of eye gaze and spatial attention on the processing of tactile events: Evidence from event-related potentials. Gherri E; Forster B Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():239-47. PubMed ID: 26101088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple foci of spatial attention in multimodal working memory. Katus T; Eimer M Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():583-589. PubMed ID: 27544450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions. Forster B; Sambo CF; Pavone EF Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19665517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement. Juravle G; Heed T; Spence C; Röder B Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1293-305. PubMed ID: 26914480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crossmodal influences on early somatosensory processing: interaction of vision, touch, and task-relevance. Dionne JK; Legon W; Staines WR Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 226(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 23455852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch. Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials. Gherri E; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task. Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological Evidence for a Sensory Recruitment Model of Somatosensory Working Memory. Katus T; Grubert A; Eimer M Cereb Cortex; 2015 Dec; 25(12):4697-703. PubMed ID: 25013002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring potential social influences on brain potentials during anticipation of tactile stimulation. Shen G; Saby JN; Drew AR; Marshall PJ Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 1659():8-18. PubMed ID: 28111163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The orienting of attention during eye and hand movements: ERP evidence for similar frame of reference but different spatially specific modulations of tactile processing. Gherri E; Forster B Biol Psychol; 2012 Oct; 91(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 22750676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prefrontal cortex and somatosensory cortex in tactile crossmodal association: an independent component analysis of ERP recordings. Ku Y; Ohara S; Wang L; Lenz FA; Hsiao SS; Bodner M; Hong B; Zhou YD PLoS One; 2007 Aug; 2(8):e771. PubMed ID: 17712419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature. Calzolari E; Azañón E; Danvers M; Vallar G; Longo MR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(17):4555-4560. PubMed ID: 28396426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]