266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38401238)
41. Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal.
Noda R; Izaki Y; Kitano F; Komatsu J; Ichikawa D; Shibagaki Y
Clin Exp Nephrol; 2024 May; 28(5):465-469. PubMed ID: 38353783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Can AI pass the written European Board Examination in Neurological Surgery? - Ethical and practical issues.
Stengel FC; Stienen MN; Ivanov M; Gandía-González ML; Raffa G; Ganau M; Whitfield P; Motov S
Brain Spine; 2024; 4():102765. PubMed ID: 38510593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Performance of ChatGPT on Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology multiple-choice questions.
Passby L; Jenko N; Wernham A
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 49(7):722-727. PubMed ID: 37264670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Artificial intelligence model GPT4 narrowly fails simulated radiological protection exam.
Roemer G; Li A; Mahmood U; Dauer L; Bellamy M
J Radiol Prot; 2024 Jan; 44(1):. PubMed ID: 38232401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on Neurosurgery Written Board Examinations.
Ali R; Tang OY; Connolly ID; Zadnik Sullivan PL; Shin JH; Fridley JS; Asaad WF; Cielo D; Oyelese AA; Doberstein CE; Gokaslan ZL; Telfeian AE
Neurosurgery; 2023 Dec; 93(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 37581444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessment of Pathology Domain-Specific Knowledge of ChatGPT and Comparison to Human Performance.
Wang AY; Lin S; Tran C; Homer RJ; Wilsdon D; Walsh JC; Goebel EA; Sansano I; Sonawane S; Cockenpot V; Mukhopadhyay S; Taskin T; Zahra N; Cima L; Semerci O; Özamrak BG; Mishra P; Vennavalli NS; Chen PC; Cecchini MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38244054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating ChatGPT Performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.
Kung JE; Marshall C; Gauthier C; Gonzalez TA; Jackson JB
JB JS Open Access; 2023; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 37693092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Orthopaedic Resident Performance on Orthopaedic Assessment Examinations.
Massey PA; Montgomery C; Zhang AS
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 31(23):1173-1179. PubMed ID: 37671415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.
He Z; Bhasuran B; Jin Q; Tian S; Hanna K; Shavor C; Arguello LG; Murray P; Lu Z
ArXiv; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38529075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 dermatological knowledge level based on the Specialty Certificate Examination in Dermatology.
Lewandowski M; Łukowicz P; Świetlik D; Barańska-Rybak W
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 49(7):686-691. PubMed ID: 37540015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment.
Mihalache A; Popovic MM; Muni RH
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 141(6):589-597. PubMed ID: 37103928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Evaluation of Reliability, Repeatability, Robustness, and Confidence of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on a Radiology Board-style Examination.
Krishna S; Bhambra N; Bleakney R; Bhayana R
Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e232715. PubMed ID: 38771184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. ChatGPT performance on radiation technologist and therapist entry to practice exams.
Duggan R; Tsuruda KM
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 May; 55(4):101426. PubMed ID: 38797622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluating the Artificial Intelligence Performance Growth in Ophthalmic Knowledge.
Jiao C; Edupuganti NR; Patel PA; Bui T; Sheth V
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45700. PubMed ID: 37868408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Performance and exploration of ChatGPT in medical examination, records and education in Chinese: Pave the way for medical AI.
Wang H; Wu W; Dou Z; He L; Yang L
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Sep; 177():105173. PubMed ID: 37549499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLM) for the Plastic Surgery Resident Training: Do They Have a Role?
Mohapatra DP; Thiruvoth FM; Tripathy S; Rajan S; Vathulya M; Lakshmi P; Singh VK; Haq AU
Indian J Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 56(5):413-420. PubMed ID: 38026769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The Performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard on the Japanese National Dentist Examination: A Comparison Study.
Ohta K; Ohta S
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50369. PubMed ID: 38213361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing the accuracy and completeness of artificial intelligence language models in providing information on methotrexate use.
Coskun BN; Yagiz B; Ocakoglu G; Dalkilic E; Pehlivan Y
Rheumatol Int; 2024 Mar; 44(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 37747564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. ChatGPT performance in the medical specialty exam: An observational study.
Oztermeli AD; Oztermeli A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Aug; 102(32):e34673. PubMed ID: 37565917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Performance of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Dental Licensing Examinations.
Chau RCW; Thu KM; Yu OY; Hsung RT; Lo ECM; Lam WYH
Int Dent J; 2024 Jun; 74(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 38242810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
