These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38401455)

  • 1. Mechano-driven intervertebral bone bridging via oriented mechanical stimulus in a twist metamaterial cage: An in silico study.
    Huo M; He S; Zhang Y; Liu Q; Liu M; Zhou G; Zhou P; Lu J
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 171():108149. PubMed ID: 38401455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Internal Mechanical Environment of Porous Scaffolds on Mechano-driven Bone Ingrowth: A Numerical Study.
    Huo M; He S; Liu Q; Feng Y; Liu M; Zhou P; Lu J
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Sep; 145(9):. PubMed ID: 37144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
    Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study.
    Yang SH; Xiao FR; Lai DM; Wei CK; Tsuang FY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 34343157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Bashkuev M; Checa S; Postigo S; Duda G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3274-82. PubMed ID: 26162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity.
    Lee YH; Chung CJ; Wang CW; Peng YT; Chang CH; Chen CH; Chen YN; Li CT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():35-45. PubMed ID: 26874064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Kleemann R; Duda G; Wise DL; Trantolo DJ; Lewandrowski KU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.
    Sun J; Wang Q; Cai D; Gu W; Ma Y; Sun Y; Wei Y; Yuan F
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):390. PubMed ID: 33902500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of cage stiffness on the rate of lumbar interbody fusion: an in vivo model using poly(l-lactic Acid) and titanium cages.
    van Dijk M; Smit TH; Sugihara S; Burger EH; Wuisman PI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):682-8. PubMed ID: 11923659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold as an autograft-free spinal fusion cage in a sheep model.
    Li Y; Wu ZG; Li XK; Guo Z; Wu SH; Zhang YQ; Shi L; Teoh SH; Liu YC; Zhang ZY
    Biomaterials; 2014 Jul; 35(22):5647-59. PubMed ID: 24743032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-cage reconstruction versus a single mega-cage reconstruction for lumbar interbody fusion: an experimental comparison.
    Murakami H; Horton WC; Tomita K; Hutton WC
    Eur Spine J; 2004 Aug; 13(5):432-40. PubMed ID: 15048561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.
    Kandziora F; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Schaefer J; Scholz A; Schmidmaier G; Schröder R; Bail H; Duda G; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):321-32. PubMed ID: 11990842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in 3D vs. 2D analysis in lumbar spinal fusion simulations.
    Hsu HW; Bashkuev M; Pumberger M; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 72():262-267. PubMed ID: 29559240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.