BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38401533)

  • 1. Enhancing quality assurance in radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers: implementation of an on-demand peer review process.
    Bhattacharyya T; Chakraborty S; Achari RB; Mallick I; Arunsingh M; Shenoy S; Harilal V; Phesao V; Maulik S; Manjunath NV; Mukherjee P; Sarkar N; Sinha A; Sarkar S; Vashistha B; Khanum H; Chatterjee S
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 97(1155):680-693. PubMed ID: 38401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Processes for the Assessment of Radiation Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Gogineni E; Schaefer D; Ewing A; Andraos T; DiCostanzo D; Weldon M; Christ D; Baliga S; Jhawar S; Mitchell D; Grecula J; Konieczkowski DJ; Palmer J; Jahraus T; Dibs K; Chakravarti A; Martin D; Gamez ME; Blakaj D
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(3):e205-e213. PubMed ID: 38237893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
    Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Tao R; Wong AJR; Awan MJ; Kuruvila S; Aristophanous M; Gunn GB; Phan J; Beadle BM; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Morrison WH; Fuller CD; Rosenthal DI
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 28258898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer Review of Radiotherapy Planning: Quantifying Outcomes and a Proposal for Prospective Data Collection.
    Mackenzie J; Graham G; Olivotto IA
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Dec; 28(12):e192-e198. PubMed ID: 27633327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Multi-Institutional Prospective Peer Review on Target and Organ-at-Risk Delineation in Radiation Therapy.
    Riegel AC; Vaccarelli M; Cox BW; Chou H; Cao Y; Potters L
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Mar; 9(2):e228-e235. PubMed ID: 30415075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Long Does Contouring Really Take? Results of the Royal College of Radiologists Contouring Surveys.
    Montague E; Roques T; Spencer K; Burnett A; Lourenco J; Thorp N
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2024 Jun; 36(6):335-342. PubMed ID: 38519383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility.
    Albert AA; Duggar WN; Bhandari RP; Vengaloor Thomas T; Packianathan S; Allbright RM; Kanakamedala MR; Mehta D; Yang CC; Vijayakumar S
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):239. PubMed ID: 30509283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Peer Review in Reducing Uncertainty in the Definition of the Lung Target Volume Among Trainee Oncologists.
    Mercieca S; Pan S; Belderbos J; Salem A; Tenant S; Aznar MC; Woolf D; Radhakrishna G; van Herk M
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2020 Jun; 32(6):363-372. PubMed ID: 32033892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of peer-review quality rounds for gynecologic brachytherapy in a high-volume academic center.
    Huynh-Le MP; Simon AB; Hoopes DJ; Einck JP; Yashar CM; Scanderbeg D; Rash D; Brown D; Mell LK; Sanghvi PR; Mundt AJ; Pawlicki T; Mayadev JS
    Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(6):881-888. PubMed ID: 31917179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Interactive MRI-Based Radiologist Review on Radiotherapy Target Volume Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer.
    Adjogatse D; Petkar I; Reis Ferreira M; Kong A; Lei M; Thomas C; Barrington SF; Dudau C; Touska P; Guerrero Urbano T; Connor SEJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 36702503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directly Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment Through Peer Review: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Cancer Centers Across a Provincial Cancer Program.
    Rouette J; Gutierrez E; O'Donnell J; Reddeman L; Hart M; Foxcroft S; Mitera G; Warde P; Brundage MD; ;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 28258891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quantitative impact of joint peer review with a specialist radiologist in head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning.
    Chiu K; Hoskin P; Gupta A; Butt R; Terparia S; Codd L; Tsang Y; Bhudia J; Killen H; Kane C; Ghoshray S; Lemon C; Megias D
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211219. PubMed ID: 34918547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nurse- and peer-led support program to assist women in gynaecological oncology receiving curative radiotherapy, the PeNTAGOn study (peer and nurse support trial to assist women in gynaecological oncology): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Schofield P; Juraskova I; Bergin R; Gough K; Mileshkin L; Krishnasamy M; White K; Bernshaw D; Penberthy S; Aranda S
    Trials; 2013 Feb; 14():39. PubMed ID: 23399476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A nurse- and peer-led psycho-educational intervention to support women with gynaecological cancers receiving curative radiotherapy: The PeNTAGOn randomised controlled trial - ANZGOG 1102.
    Schofield P; Gough K; Pascoe M; Bergin R; White K; Mileshkin L; Bernshaw D; Kinnane N; Jackson M; Do V; Brand A; Aranda S; Cheuk R; Drosdowsky A; Penberthy S; Juraskova I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):785-793. PubMed ID: 32962898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementing Head and Neck Contouring Peer Review without Pathway Delay: The On-demand Approach.
    Fong C; Sanghera P; Good J; Nightingale P; Hartley A
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Dec; 29(12):841-847. PubMed ID: 28988705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Referral patterns for gynaecological radiotherapy in Victoria.
    Gard GB; Quinn MA; Narayan K; Bernshaw DM; Planner RS; Taylor M
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Feb; 40(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 10870782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of nodal coverage utilizing image guided radiation therapy for primary gynecologic tumor volumes.
    Ahmed F; Sarkar V; Gaffney DK; Salter B; Poppe MM
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 26994828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists.
    Giraud P; Elles S; Helfre S; De Rycke Y; Servois V; Carette MF; Alzieu C; Bondiau PY; Dubray B; Touboul E; Housset M; Rosenwald JC; Cosset JM
    Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jan; 62(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 11830310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing safety and quality through preplanning peer review for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Matuszak MM; Hadley SW; Feng M; Hayman JA; Brock KK; Burger P; Owen D; Suresh K; Schipper M; Lawrence TS; Moran JM
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(2):e39-46. PubMed ID: 26746815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Gynaecological Cancers: A Systematic Review.
    Mendez LC; Leung E; Cheung P; Barbera L
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jun; 29(6):378-384. PubMed ID: 28209456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.