These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38401541)

  • 1. Learning attentional templates for value-based decision-making.
    Jahn CI; Markov NT; Morea B; Daw ND; Ebitz RB; Buschman TJ
    Cell; 2024 Mar; 187(6):1476-1489.e21. PubMed ID: 38401541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.
    Tankelevitch L; Spaak E; Rushworth MFS; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(26):5033-5050. PubMed ID: 32366722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.
    Lee J; Geng JJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(5):1257-1268. PubMed ID: 28028199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal attention tuning in a neuro-computational model of the visual cortex-basal ganglia-prefrontal cortex loop.
    Maith O; Schwarz A; Hamker FH
    Neural Netw; 2021 Oct; 142():534-547. PubMed ID: 34314999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning optimizes decision templates in the human visual cortex.
    Kuai SG; Levi D; Kourtzi Z
    Curr Biol; 2013 Sep; 23(18):1799-804. PubMed ID: 24012311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From learned value to sustained bias: how reward conditioning changes attentional priority.
    Meyer KN; Hopfinger JB; Vidrascu EM; Boettiger CA; Robinson DL; Sheridan MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1354142. PubMed ID: 38689827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):2977-2989. PubMed ID: 35696178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reward salience but not spatial attention dominates the value representation in the orbitofrontal cortex.
    Zhang W; Xie Y; Yang T
    Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):6306. PubMed ID: 36273229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Category learning in a recurrent neural network with reinforcement learning.
    Zhang Y; Pan X; Wang Y
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1008011. PubMed ID: 36387007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional Templates Are Sharpened through Differential Signal Enhancement, Not Differential Allocation of Attention.
    Kerzel D; Cong SH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(4):594-610. PubMed ID: 33464161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Building compositional tasks with shared neural subspaces.
    Tafazoli S; Bouchacourt FM; Ardalan A; Markov NT; Uchimura M; Mattar MG; Daw ND; Buschman TJ
    bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38352540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional Selection Can Be Predicted by Reinforcement Learning of Task-relevant Stimulus Features Weighted by Value-independent Stickiness.
    Balcarras M; Ardid S; Kaping D; Everling S; Womelsdorf T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 28(2):333-49. PubMed ID: 26488586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional templates are protected from retroactive interference during visual search: Converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Huynh Cong S; Kerzel D
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108026. PubMed ID: 34547308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Preparatory Activation of Guidance Templates for Visual Search and of Target Templates in Non-Search Tasks.
    Dodwell G; Nako R; Eimer M
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):11. PubMed ID: 38223224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search.
    de Vries IE; van Driel J; Olivers CN
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(6):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 28069918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search.
    Kerzel D; Grubert A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):901-909. PubMed ID: 34918268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shared mechanisms underlie the control of working memory and attention.
    Panichello MF; Buschman TJ
    Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7855):601-605. PubMed ID: 33790467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.