These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10-Year Implant Survivorship? Alter TD; Hadley ML; Couch CG; Fruth KM; Bedard NA; Perry KI; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S194-S202. PubMed ID: 38599525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-centre radiological survivorship of acetabular distraction technique for treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity: mean five-year follow-up. Sheth NP; Melnic CM; Brown N; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):909-914. PubMed ID: 29954194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-trabecular metal cup technique for the management of Paprosky type III defects without pelvic discontinuity. Loppini M; Schiavi P; Rocca AD; Traverso F; Rocca FD; Mazziotta G; Astore F; Grappiolo G Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):66-72. PubMed ID: 30755117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acetabular Distraction Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuities: Excellent Short-Term Implant Survivorship and Good Clinical Outcomes. Bingham JS; Arthur JR; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Abdel MP J Arthroplasty; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2966-2971. PubMed ID: 32553514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity. Sheth NP; Melnic CM; Paprosky WG Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):36-42. PubMed ID: 25381406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up. Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision. Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results. Roessler PP; Jaenisch M; Kuhlmann M; Wacker M; Johannes Wagenhäuser P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2269-2278. PubMed ID: 30539219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity. Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Sporer SM; Bottros JJ; Hulst JB; Kancherla VK; Moric M; Paprosky WG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Nov; 470(11):3156-63. PubMed ID: 23001499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity? Mu W; Xu B; Wahafu T; Wang F; Guo W; Zou C; Cao L Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Dec; 482(12):2149-2160. PubMed ID: 38991223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases. Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of trabecular metal augments in Paprosky IIIA and IIIB defects: A multicentre study. Eachempati KK; Malhotra R; Pichai S; Reddy AVG; Podhili Subramani AK; Gautam D; Bollavaram VR; Sheth NP Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):903-908. PubMed ID: 29954197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Evolution of the Cup-Cage Technique for Major Acetabular Defects: Full and Half Cup-Cage Reconstruction. Sculco PK; Ledford CK; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jul; 99(13):1104-1110. PubMed ID: 28678123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions. Moličnik A; Hanc M; Rečnik G; Krajnc Z; Rupreht M; Fokter SK Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Aug; 24(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 24241214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement. Brown NM; Hellman M; Haughom BH; Shah RP; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):73-7. PubMed ID: 25381413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]