142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38403659)
1. The utility of quantifying the orientation of breast masses in ultrasound imaging.
Chen K; Wu S
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4578. PubMed ID: 38403659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner.
Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses.
Li N; Hou Z; Wang J; Bi Y; Wu X; Zhan Y; Peng M
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):206. PubMed ID: 38066441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler.
Reghunath A; Mittal MK; Chintamani C; Prasad R
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):355-366. PubMed ID: 34854427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of ultrasound Angio-PLUS imaging for detecting blood flow in breast masses and comparison with color Doppler for differentiating benign from malignant masses.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Yadav S; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jun; 64(6):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 36890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complex breast masses: assessment of malignant potential based on cyst diameter.
Jales RM; Sarian LO; Peralta CF; Torresan R; Marussi EF; Alvares BR; Derchain S
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Apr; 31(4):581-7. PubMed ID: 22441915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A New Practical Decision Rule to Better Differentiate BI-RADS 3 or 4 Breast Masses on Breast Ultrasound.
Pfob A; Barr RG; Duda V; Büsch C; Bruckner T; Spratte J; Nees J; Togawa R; Ho C; Fastner S; Riedel F; Schaefgen B; Hennigs A; Sohn C; Heil J; Golatta M
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb; 41(2):427-436. PubMed ID: 33942358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.
Wolfson S; Heller SL; Gao Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 34549605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 99mTc-Glu-c(RGDyK)-Bombesin SPECT Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsy of Masses That Are BI-RADS Category 4 on Ultrasonography.
Ji T; Gao S; Liu Z; Xing H; Zhao G; Ma Q
J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1196-200. PubMed ID: 27013698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.
Lee EJ; Chang YW
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance of interval changes in breast lesions initially categorized as probably benign on breast ultrasound.
Jang JY; Kim SM; Kim JH; Jang M; La Yun B; Lee JY; Lee SH; Kim B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(12):e6415. PubMed ID: 28328843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A combined ultrasonic B-mode and color Doppler system for the classification of breast masses using neural network.
Qian X; Zhang B; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen X; Liu J; Yang Y; Chen X; Wei Y; Xiao Q; Ma J; Shung KK; Zhou Q; Liu L; Chen Z
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):3023-3033. PubMed ID: 32006174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
