These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38403675)
1. Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner. Koshiishi Y; Tanaka S; Iwauchi Y; Baba K J Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 66(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 38403675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques. Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices. Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Romeo M; Alonso R; Pradíes G Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1957-1962. PubMed ID: 34519908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods. Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy. Revilla-León M; Sicilia E; Agustín-Panadero R; Gómez-Polo M; Kois JC J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):746-754. PubMed ID: 34998582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi NM J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study. Garikano X; Amezua X; Iturrate M; Solaberrieta E J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):709-717. PubMed ID: 36115710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of digital intraoral full-arch scan strategies on scan time and accuracy on conditions of intraoral head-simulator]. Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Chen DP; Su YC; Wang X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 34763404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study. Revilla-León M; Quesada-Olmo N; Gómez-Polo M; Sicilia E; Farjas-Abadia M; Kois JC J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103851. PubMed ID: 34656658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study. Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial. Dohiem MM; Emam NS; Abdallah MF; Abdelaziz MS J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4254-4263. PubMed ID: 36117136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment-scan body system depending on the scan pattern and implant location: An in-vitro study. Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104169. PubMed ID: 35661761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro. Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]